Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease

BackgroundBiomarker screening is of major significance for the early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Routine peripheral blood parameters are easy to collect and detect, making them ideal potential biomarkers. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the parameters from routine blood as poten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyu Dong, Jianfei Nao, Jile Shi, Dongming Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00332/full
id doaj-3c929667435c4535b4729ff9dd746b06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c929667435c4535b4729ff9dd746b062020-11-25T02:20:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience1663-43652019-12-011110.3389/fnagi.2019.00332491908Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s DiseaseXiaoyu DongJianfei NaoJile ShiDongming ZhengBackgroundBiomarker screening is of major significance for the early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Routine peripheral blood parameters are easy to collect and detect, making them ideal potential biomarkers. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the parameters from routine blood as potential biomarkers for AD.MethodsWe enrolled 56 AD patients, 57 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and 59 healthy elderly controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic values of routine blood biomarkers in patients with cognitive impairment.ResultsThere were significant differences in eight parameters between the groups. Logistic regression revealed that the neutrophil% (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.75, p = 0.031) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; OR 6.27, 95% CI 3.98–9.82, p = 0.003) differentiated AD patients and controls (areas under the curve [AUCs], 0.728 and 0.721) and that the NLR (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.07–3.47, p = 0.028) and mean platelet volume (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.04–2.70, p = 0.036) differentiated MCI patients and controls (AUCs, 0.60 and 0.638). There were no effective diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish AD from MCI.ConclusionSome routine blood biomarkers may correlate with cognitive impairment. Analysis of these biomarkers, such as the NLR, may be useful for the identification of patients with cognitive impairment.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00332/fullAlzheimer diseasebiomarkersblood routinemild cognitive impairmentaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoyu Dong
Jianfei Nao
Jile Shi
Dongming Zheng
spellingShingle Xiaoyu Dong
Jianfei Nao
Jile Shi
Dongming Zheng
Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Alzheimer disease
biomarkers
blood routine
mild cognitive impairment
aging
author_facet Xiaoyu Dong
Jianfei Nao
Jile Shi
Dongming Zheng
author_sort Xiaoyu Dong
title Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Value of Routine Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort predictive value of routine peripheral blood biomarkers in alzheimer’s disease
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
issn 1663-4365
publishDate 2019-12-01
description BackgroundBiomarker screening is of major significance for the early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Routine peripheral blood parameters are easy to collect and detect, making them ideal potential biomarkers. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the parameters from routine blood as potential biomarkers for AD.MethodsWe enrolled 56 AD patients, 57 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and 59 healthy elderly controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic values of routine blood biomarkers in patients with cognitive impairment.ResultsThere were significant differences in eight parameters between the groups. Logistic regression revealed that the neutrophil% (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.75, p = 0.031) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; OR 6.27, 95% CI 3.98–9.82, p = 0.003) differentiated AD patients and controls (areas under the curve [AUCs], 0.728 and 0.721) and that the NLR (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.07–3.47, p = 0.028) and mean platelet volume (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.04–2.70, p = 0.036) differentiated MCI patients and controls (AUCs, 0.60 and 0.638). There were no effective diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish AD from MCI.ConclusionSome routine blood biomarkers may correlate with cognitive impairment. Analysis of these biomarkers, such as the NLR, may be useful for the identification of patients with cognitive impairment.
topic Alzheimer disease
biomarkers
blood routine
mild cognitive impairment
aging
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00332/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyudong predictivevalueofroutineperipheralbloodbiomarkersinalzheimersdisease
AT jianfeinao predictivevalueofroutineperipheralbloodbiomarkersinalzheimersdisease
AT jileshi predictivevalueofroutineperipheralbloodbiomarkersinalzheimersdisease
AT dongmingzheng predictivevalueofroutineperipheralbloodbiomarkersinalzheimersdisease
_version_ 1724873338756530176