Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis

abstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to resear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignacio Morales-Cané, María Del Rocío Valverde-León, María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo
Series:Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-3cad2143b1a04f89b8c693e6d2a713ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cad2143b1a04f89b8c693e6d2a713ab2020-11-25T00:07:04ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem1518-834524010.1590/1518-8345.1317.2821S0104-11692016000100616Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysisIgnacio Morales-CanéMaría Del Rocío Valverde-LeónMaría Aurora Rodríguez-Borregoabstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to research clinical trials and observational studies: Medline, Embase and Cochrane, from 2005 to 2015. Results: when the Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with administration of epinephrine was compared with ROSC without administration, increased rates were found with administration (OR 2.02. 95% CI 1.49 to 2.75; I2 = 95%). Meta-analysis showed an increase in survival to discharge or 30 days after administration of epinephrine (OR 1.23; 95% IC 1.05-1.44; I2=83%). Stratification by shockable and non-shockable rhythms showed an increase in survival for non-shockable rhythm (OR 1.52; 95% IC 1.29-1.78; I2=42%). When compared with delayed administration, the administration of epinephrine within 10 minutes showed an increased survival rate (OR 2.03; 95% IC 1.77-2.32; I2=0%). Conclusion: administration of epinephrine appears to increase the rate of ROSC, but when compared with other therapies, no positive effect was found on survival rates of patients with favorable neurological status.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=enParada CardíacaEpinefrinaSobrevivência, Enfermagem
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ignacio Morales-Cané
María Del Rocío Valverde-León
María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego
spellingShingle Ignacio Morales-Cané
María Del Rocío Valverde-León
María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Parada Cardíaca
Epinefrina
Sobrevivência, Enfermagem
author_facet Ignacio Morales-Cané
María Del Rocío Valverde-León
María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego
author_sort Ignacio Morales-Cané
title Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
series Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
issn 1518-8345
description abstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to research clinical trials and observational studies: Medline, Embase and Cochrane, from 2005 to 2015. Results: when the Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with administration of epinephrine was compared with ROSC without administration, increased rates were found with administration (OR 2.02. 95% CI 1.49 to 2.75; I2 = 95%). Meta-analysis showed an increase in survival to discharge or 30 days after administration of epinephrine (OR 1.23; 95% IC 1.05-1.44; I2=83%). Stratification by shockable and non-shockable rhythms showed an increase in survival for non-shockable rhythm (OR 1.52; 95% IC 1.29-1.78; I2=42%). When compared with delayed administration, the administration of epinephrine within 10 minutes showed an increased survival rate (OR 2.03; 95% IC 1.77-2.32; I2=0%). Conclusion: administration of epinephrine appears to increase the rate of ROSC, but when compared with other therapies, no positive effect was found on survival rates of patients with favorable neurological status.
topic Parada Cardíaca
Epinefrina
Sobrevivência, Enfermagem
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT ignaciomoralescane epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariadelrociovalverdeleon epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariaaurorarodriguezborrego epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725420099568926720