Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
abstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to resear...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo
|
Series: | Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-3cad2143b1a04f89b8c693e6d2a713ab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3cad2143b1a04f89b8c693e6d2a713ab2020-11-25T00:07:04ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem1518-834524010.1590/1518-8345.1317.2821S0104-11692016000100616Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysisIgnacio Morales-CanéMaría Del Rocío Valverde-LeónMaría Aurora Rodríguez-Borregoabstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to research clinical trials and observational studies: Medline, Embase and Cochrane, from 2005 to 2015. Results: when the Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with administration of epinephrine was compared with ROSC without administration, increased rates were found with administration (OR 2.02. 95% CI 1.49 to 2.75; I2 = 95%). Meta-analysis showed an increase in survival to discharge or 30 days after administration of epinephrine (OR 1.23; 95% IC 1.05-1.44; I2=83%). Stratification by shockable and non-shockable rhythms showed an increase in survival for non-shockable rhythm (OR 1.52; 95% IC 1.29-1.78; I2=42%). When compared with delayed administration, the administration of epinephrine within 10 minutes showed an increased survival rate (OR 2.03; 95% IC 1.77-2.32; I2=0%). Conclusion: administration of epinephrine appears to increase the rate of ROSC, but when compared with other therapies, no positive effect was found on survival rates of patients with favorable neurological status.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=enParada CardíacaEpinefrinaSobrevivência, Enfermagem |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ignacio Morales-Cané María Del Rocío Valverde-León María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego |
spellingShingle |
Ignacio Morales-Cané María Del Rocío Valverde-León María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem Parada Cardíaca Epinefrina Sobrevivência, Enfermagem |
author_facet |
Ignacio Morales-Cané María Del Rocío Valverde-León María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego |
author_sort |
Ignacio Morales-Cané |
title |
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
epinephrine in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Universidade de São Paulo |
series |
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem |
issn |
1518-8345 |
description |
abstract Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of epinephrine used during cardiac arrest and its effect on the survival rates and neurological condition. Method: systematic review of scientific literature with meta-analysis, using a random effects model. The following databases were used to research clinical trials and observational studies: Medline, Embase and Cochrane, from 2005 to 2015. Results: when the Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) with administration of epinephrine was compared with ROSC without administration, increased rates were found with administration (OR 2.02. 95% CI 1.49 to 2.75; I2 = 95%). Meta-analysis showed an increase in survival to discharge or 30 days after administration of epinephrine (OR 1.23; 95% IC 1.05-1.44; I2=83%). Stratification by shockable and non-shockable rhythms showed an increase in survival for non-shockable rhythm (OR 1.52; 95% IC 1.29-1.78; I2=42%). When compared with delayed administration, the administration of epinephrine within 10 minutes showed an increased survival rate (OR 2.03; 95% IC 1.77-2.32; I2=0%). Conclusion: administration of epinephrine appears to increase the rate of ROSC, but when compared with other therapies, no positive effect was found on survival rates of patients with favorable neurological status. |
topic |
Parada Cardíaca Epinefrina Sobrevivência, Enfermagem |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100616&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ignaciomoralescane epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariadelrociovalverdeleon epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariaaurorarodriguezborrego epinephrineincardiacarrestsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725420099568926720 |