Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?

The reasons why scholars choose one paradigm to the detriment of another are not only scientific but also epistemological. This theoretical-epistemological amalgam, in its turn, provides a certain specific kind of economic development proposals. Neoclassical economics is closely connected with logic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brena Paula Magno Fernandez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2011-01-01
Series:Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/19246/14460
id doaj-3cd1de86c20f46238b338cf4d71b64aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cd1de86c20f46238b338cf4d71b64aa2021-04-02T15:29:29ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáDesenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente1518-952X2176-91092011-01-0123109120Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?Brena Paula Magno FernandezThe reasons why scholars choose one paradigm to the detriment of another are not only scientific but also epistemological. This theoretical-epistemological amalgam, in its turn, provides a certain specific kind of economic development proposals. Neoclassical economics is closely connected with logical positivism (as an epistemological approach) and favors the conception that the virtually unlimited economic growth would be a necessary (and sufficient) condition to economic development. The strong reliance on economic growth in GDP-terms as an adequate indicator of economic development reflects and exemplifies the dominance of the mainstream in Economics at all three levels: methodological/epistemological, theoretical and pragmatic/political. When faced with new challenges such as the need for a Sustainable Development, for instance, and the persistence (or even the increase) of the economic inequality between North and South, the shortcomings of the dominant paradigm become accentuated. In this paper we argue that, in order to overcome this state of affairs, alternatives to the mainstream ought to be discussed and articulated at all three levels mentioned above, and that this goal has been followed by the Eco-development/Sustainable Development proposal.http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/19246/14460Eco-developmentSustainable DevelopmentEcological Economics.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brena Paula Magno Fernandez
spellingShingle Brena Paula Magno Fernandez
Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
Eco-development
Sustainable Development
Ecological Economics.
author_facet Brena Paula Magno Fernandez
author_sort Brena Paula Magno Fernandez
title Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
title_short Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
title_full Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
title_fullStr Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
title_full_unstemmed Ecodesenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Economia Ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
title_sort ecodesenvolvimento, desenvolvimento sustentável e economia ecológica: em que sentido representam alternativas ao paradigma de desenvolvimento tradicional?
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
issn 1518-952X
2176-9109
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The reasons why scholars choose one paradigm to the detriment of another are not only scientific but also epistemological. This theoretical-epistemological amalgam, in its turn, provides a certain specific kind of economic development proposals. Neoclassical economics is closely connected with logical positivism (as an epistemological approach) and favors the conception that the virtually unlimited economic growth would be a necessary (and sufficient) condition to economic development. The strong reliance on economic growth in GDP-terms as an adequate indicator of economic development reflects and exemplifies the dominance of the mainstream in Economics at all three levels: methodological/epistemological, theoretical and pragmatic/political. When faced with new challenges such as the need for a Sustainable Development, for instance, and the persistence (or even the increase) of the economic inequality between North and South, the shortcomings of the dominant paradigm become accentuated. In this paper we argue that, in order to overcome this state of affairs, alternatives to the mainstream ought to be discussed and articulated at all three levels mentioned above, and that this goal has been followed by the Eco-development/Sustainable Development proposal.
topic Eco-development
Sustainable Development
Ecological Economics.
url http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/19246/14460
work_keys_str_mv AT brenapaulamagnofernandez ecodesenvolvimentodesenvolvimentosustentaveleeconomiaecologicaemquesentidorepresentamalternativasaoparadigmadedesenvolvimentotradicional
_version_ 1721559985438064640