Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis

This is a corpus study aimed to compare six Iranian general English university textbook’s reading comprehension passages and the passages of reading comprehension section of MA exams from 2010 to 2014. The study used three reading related factors to make the comparison: vocabulary coverage, syntacti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyyed Bagher Mirshojaee, Rahman Sahragard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, 2015-03-01
Series:Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_797_9523fd0a3ac5e740286984698b3963e8.pdf
id doaj-3cd66fc5ffc24714a6e410ede92df20e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cd66fc5ffc24714a6e410ede92df20e2020-11-25T01:23:25ZengImam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 2676-53572676-53572015-03-01227798797Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus AnalysisSeyyed Bagher Mirshojaee0Rahman Sahragard1PhD student of Shiraz universityAssociate Professor of Applies Linguistics at Shiraz UniversityThis is a corpus study aimed to compare six Iranian general English university textbook’s reading comprehension passages and the passages of reading comprehension section of MA exams from 2010 to 2014. The study used three reading related factors to make the comparison: vocabulary coverage, syntactic complexity and discourse features. To meet these needs, three test types were used: measures of vocabulary coverage by the vocabprofiler software, measures of readability by means of readability formulas and measures of text easibility of the Coh-Metrix software. The analyses showed a big gap between what textbooks offered with regard to vocabulary, structures and discourse and what the MA examinations asked from the readers regarding the reading comprehension processes. The findings and results were presented along with the pedagogical implications and some suggestions for future researches. <strong> </strong>http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_797_9523fd0a3ac5e740286984698b3963e8.pdfreading comprehensionvocabulary coveragereadabilitytext easibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seyyed Bagher Mirshojaee
Rahman Sahragard
spellingShingle Seyyed Bagher Mirshojaee
Rahman Sahragard
Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
reading comprehension
vocabulary coverage
readability
text easibility
author_facet Seyyed Bagher Mirshojaee
Rahman Sahragard
author_sort Seyyed Bagher Mirshojaee
title Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
title_short Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
title_full Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
title_fullStr Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reading Comprehension Passages of Iranian General English Books and MA Reading Comprehension Tests: A Corpus Analysis
title_sort reading comprehension passages of iranian general english books and ma reading comprehension tests: a corpus analysis
publisher Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,
series Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
issn 2676-5357
2676-5357
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This is a corpus study aimed to compare six Iranian general English university textbook’s reading comprehension passages and the passages of reading comprehension section of MA exams from 2010 to 2014. The study used three reading related factors to make the comparison: vocabulary coverage, syntactic complexity and discourse features. To meet these needs, three test types were used: measures of vocabulary coverage by the vocabprofiler software, measures of readability by means of readability formulas and measures of text easibility of the Coh-Metrix software. The analyses showed a big gap between what textbooks offered with regard to vocabulary, structures and discourse and what the MA examinations asked from the readers regarding the reading comprehension processes. The findings and results were presented along with the pedagogical implications and some suggestions for future researches. <strong> </strong>
topic reading comprehension
vocabulary coverage
readability
text easibility
url http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_797_9523fd0a3ac5e740286984698b3963e8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seyyedbaghermirshojaee readingcomprehensionpassagesofiraniangeneralenglishbooksandmareadingcomprehensiontestsacorpusanalysis
AT rahmansahragard readingcomprehensionpassagesofiraniangeneralenglishbooksandmareadingcomprehensiontestsacorpusanalysis
_version_ 1725122372973887488