Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value
Though flawed, dated, and disavowed, Selwyn Goldsmith's 1967 book Designing for the Disabled warrants serious consideration by designers today. Published as a revision of the book's first edition (1963), the second represents a complete rethinking of questions of design and disability from...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-01-01
|
Series: | She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872620300678 |
id |
doaj-3d1082066e174842ae9b558ded03e158 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d1082066e174842ae9b558ded03e1582020-12-19T05:09:30ZengElsevierShe Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation2405-87262020-01-0164439454Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring valueElizabeth Guffey0State University of New York, Purchase College, USAThough flawed, dated, and disavowed, Selwyn Goldsmith's 1967 book Designing for the Disabled warrants serious consideration by designers today. Published as a revision of the book's first edition (1963), the second represents a complete rethinking of questions of design and disability from an avowedly British perspective, challenging dominant American assumptions about the perils of dependence and the desirability of independence. Admittedly, Goldsmith makes some troubling assumptions about disabilities, and his language is now very dated. Moreover, in the 1990s, he disavowed the approach that he advocated in the second (and third) edition of his book. Even so, the ideals of interdependence and expression of care—and the approach to designing for disability—that he first articulated in the second edition feel more relevant today than ever.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872620300678Design for disabilityDesign studiesUniversal designCivil rightsAccessibilityInclusive design |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elizabeth Guffey |
spellingShingle |
Elizabeth Guffey Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation Design for disability Design studies Universal design Civil rights Accessibility Inclusive design |
author_facet |
Elizabeth Guffey |
author_sort |
Elizabeth Guffey |
title |
Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
title_short |
Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
title_full |
Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
title_fullStr |
Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selwyn Goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): Flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
title_sort |
selwyn goldsmith's designing for the disabled, 2nd ed. (1967): flawed, dated, and disavowed, yet a classic with enduring value |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation |
issn |
2405-8726 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Though flawed, dated, and disavowed, Selwyn Goldsmith's 1967 book Designing for the Disabled warrants serious consideration by designers today. Published as a revision of the book's first edition (1963), the second represents a complete rethinking of questions of design and disability from an avowedly British perspective, challenging dominant American assumptions about the perils of dependence and the desirability of independence. Admittedly, Goldsmith makes some troubling assumptions about disabilities, and his language is now very dated. Moreover, in the 1990s, he disavowed the approach that he advocated in the second (and third) edition of his book. Even so, the ideals of interdependence and expression of care—and the approach to designing for disability—that he first articulated in the second edition feel more relevant today than ever. |
topic |
Design for disability Design studies Universal design Civil rights Accessibility Inclusive design |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872620300678 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elizabethguffey selwyngoldsmithsdesigningforthedisabled2nded1967flaweddatedanddisavowedyetaclassicwithenduringvalue |
_version_ |
1724377629137567744 |