Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexeyenko Andrey, Lee Woojoo, Pernemalm Maria, Guegan Justin, Dessen Philippe, Lazar Vladimir, Lehtiö Janne, Pawitan Yudi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/226
id doaj-3d4572a5a98041838d6cd670252d2478
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d4572a5a98041838d6cd670252d24782020-11-25T00:26:35ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052012-09-0113122610.1186/1471-2105-13-226Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networksAlexeyenko AndreyLee WoojooPernemalm MariaGuegan JustinDessen PhilippeLazar VladimirLehtiö JannePawitan Yudi<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-represented in the experimental set; the assessment is based on an overlap statistic. Rich biological information in terms of gene interaction network is now widely available, but this topological information is not used by GEA, so there is a need for methods that exploit this type of information in high-throughput data analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We developed a method of network enrichment analysis (NEA) that extends the overlap statistic in GEA to network links between genes in the experimental set and those in the functional categories. For the crucial step in statistical inference, we developed a fast network randomization algorithm in order to obtain the distribution of any network statistic under the null hypothesis of no association between an experimental gene-set and a functional category. We illustrate the NEA method using gene and protein expression data from a lung cancer study.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results indicate that the NEA method is more powerful than the traditional GEA, primarily because the relationships between gene sets were more strongly captured by network connectivity rather than by simple overlaps.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/226
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexeyenko Andrey
Lee Woojoo
Pernemalm Maria
Guegan Justin
Dessen Philippe
Lazar Vladimir
Lehtiö Janne
Pawitan Yudi
spellingShingle Alexeyenko Andrey
Lee Woojoo
Pernemalm Maria
Guegan Justin
Dessen Philippe
Lazar Vladimir
Lehtiö Janne
Pawitan Yudi
Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Alexeyenko Andrey
Lee Woojoo
Pernemalm Maria
Guegan Justin
Dessen Philippe
Lazar Vladimir
Lehtiö Janne
Pawitan Yudi
author_sort Alexeyenko Andrey
title Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
title_short Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
title_full Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
title_fullStr Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
title_full_unstemmed Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
title_sort network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene-set enrichment analyses (GEA or GSEA) are commonly used for biological characterization of an experimental gene-set. This is done by finding known functional categories, such as pathways or Gene Ontology terms, that are over-represented in the experimental set; the assessment is based on an overlap statistic. Rich biological information in terms of gene interaction network is now widely available, but this topological information is not used by GEA, so there is a need for methods that exploit this type of information in high-throughput data analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We developed a method of network enrichment analysis (NEA) that extends the overlap statistic in GEA to network links between genes in the experimental set and those in the functional categories. For the crucial step in statistical inference, we developed a fast network randomization algorithm in order to obtain the distribution of any network statistic under the null hypothesis of no association between an experimental gene-set and a functional category. We illustrate the NEA method using gene and protein expression data from a lung cancer study.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results indicate that the NEA method is more powerful than the traditional GEA, primarily because the relationships between gene sets were more strongly captured by network connectivity rather than by simple overlaps.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/226
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeyenkoandrey networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT leewoojoo networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT pernemalmmaria networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT gueganjustin networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT dessenphilippe networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT lazarvladimir networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT lehtiojanne networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
AT pawitanyudi networkenrichmentanalysisextensionofgenesetenrichmentanalysistogenenetworks
_version_ 1725343901950148608