Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in women. Because bone metastases are a common finding in patients with breast cancer, they are of major clinical concern.</p> <p>Methods&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wegener Bernd, Schlemmer Marcus, Stemmler Joachim, Jansson Volkmar, Dürr Hans, Pietschmann Matthias F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/232
id doaj-3d584b881be74eefa264d15807d1f52a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d584b881be74eefa264d15807d1f52a2020-11-25T00:25:25ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-11-0113123210.1186/1471-2474-13-232Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patientsWegener BerndSchlemmer MarcusStemmler JoachimJansson VolkmarDürr HansPietschmann Matthias F<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in women. Because bone metastases are a common finding in patients with breast cancer, they are of major clinical concern.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 115 consecutive patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, 132 surgical procedures were performed. Medical records and imaging procedures were reviewed for age, treatment of the primary tumor, clinical symptoms, surgical treatment, complications, and survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The overall survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer was dependent on the site and the amount of the metastases. Age was not a prognostic factor for survival. If the result of the orthopaedic surgery was a wide resection (R0) survival was significantly better than in the R1 (marginal resection – tumor resection in sane tissue) or R2 (intralesional resection) situation. Concerning the orthopaedic procedures there was no survival difference.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion a wide (R0) resection and the absence of pathological fracture and visceral metastases were predictive for longer survival in univariate analysis. Age and the type of orthopaedic surgery had no impact on survival in multivariate analysis. The resection margins lost significance. The standard of care for patients with metastatic breast cancer to the bone requires a multidisciplinary approach.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/232Breast cancerBone metastasesSurgical treatment of bone metastases
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wegener Bernd
Schlemmer Marcus
Stemmler Joachim
Jansson Volkmar
Dürr Hans
Pietschmann Matthias F
spellingShingle Wegener Bernd
Schlemmer Marcus
Stemmler Joachim
Jansson Volkmar
Dürr Hans
Pietschmann Matthias F
Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Breast cancer
Bone metastases
Surgical treatment of bone metastases
author_facet Wegener Bernd
Schlemmer Marcus
Stemmler Joachim
Jansson Volkmar
Dürr Hans
Pietschmann Matthias F
author_sort Wegener Bernd
title Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
title_short Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
title_full Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
title_sort analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2012-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in women. Because bone metastases are a common finding in patients with breast cancer, they are of major clinical concern.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 115 consecutive patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, 132 surgical procedures were performed. Medical records and imaging procedures were reviewed for age, treatment of the primary tumor, clinical symptoms, surgical treatment, complications, and survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The overall survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer was dependent on the site and the amount of the metastases. Age was not a prognostic factor for survival. If the result of the orthopaedic surgery was a wide resection (R0) survival was significantly better than in the R1 (marginal resection – tumor resection in sane tissue) or R2 (intralesional resection) situation. Concerning the orthopaedic procedures there was no survival difference.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion a wide (R0) resection and the absence of pathological fracture and visceral metastases were predictive for longer survival in univariate analysis. Age and the type of orthopaedic surgery had no impact on survival in multivariate analysis. The resection margins lost significance. The standard of care for patients with metastatic breast cancer to the bone requires a multidisciplinary approach.</p>
topic Breast cancer
Bone metastases
Surgical treatment of bone metastases
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/232
work_keys_str_mv AT wegenerbernd analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
AT schlemmermarcus analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
AT stemmlerjoachim analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
AT janssonvolkmar analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
AT durrhans analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
AT pietschmannmatthiasf analysisoforthopedicsurgeryofbonemetastasesinbreastcancerpatients
_version_ 1725349058031124480