High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of high versus low attenuation thresholds for determining the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules (GGNs) for the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive ade...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Ho Lee, Tae Hoon Kim, Sungsoo Lee, Kyunghwa Han, Min Kwang Byun, Yoon Soo Chang, Hyung Jung Kim, Geun Dong Lee, Chul Hwan Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193644?pdf=render
id doaj-3d68df72b1184cdbbed61d9b99f89ab1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d68df72b1184cdbbed61d9b99f89ab12020-11-25T02:01:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011310e020549010.1371/journal.pone.0205490High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.Jae Ho LeeTae Hoon KimSungsoo LeeKyunghwa HanMin Kwang ByunYoon Soo ChangHyung Jung KimGeun Dong LeeChul Hwan ParkOBJECTIVES:To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of high versus low attenuation thresholds for determining the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules (GGNs) for the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). METHODS:Eighty-six pathologically confirmed GGNs < 3 cm observed in 86 patients (27 male, 59 female; mean age, 59.3 ± 11.0 years) between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively included. The solid component of each GGN was defined using two different attenuation thresholds: high (-160 Hounsfield units [HU]) and low (-400 HU). According to the presence or absence of solid portions, each GGN was categorized as a pure GGN or part-solid GGN. Solid components were regarded as indicators of invasive foci, suggesting MIA or IA. RESULTS:Among the 86 GGNs, there were 57 cases of IA, 19 of MIA, and 10 of AIS. Using the high attenuation threshold, 44 were categorized as pure GGNs and 42 as part-solid GGNs. Using the low attenuation threshold, 13 were categorized as pure GGNs and 73 as part-solid GGNs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for the invasive focus were 55.2%, 100%, 100%, 22.7%, and 60.4%, respectively, for the high attenuation threshold, and 93.4%, 80%, 97.2%, 61.5%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the low attenuation threshold. CONCLUSION:The low attenuation threshold was better than the conventional high attenuation threshold for determining the solid components of GGNs, which indicate invasive foci.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193644?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jae Ho Lee
Tae Hoon Kim
Sungsoo Lee
Kyunghwa Han
Min Kwang Byun
Yoon Soo Chang
Hyung Jung Kim
Geun Dong Lee
Chul Hwan Park
spellingShingle Jae Ho Lee
Tae Hoon Kim
Sungsoo Lee
Kyunghwa Han
Min Kwang Byun
Yoon Soo Chang
Hyung Jung Kim
Geun Dong Lee
Chul Hwan Park
High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jae Ho Lee
Tae Hoon Kim
Sungsoo Lee
Kyunghwa Han
Min Kwang Byun
Yoon Soo Chang
Hyung Jung Kim
Geun Dong Lee
Chul Hwan Park
author_sort Jae Ho Lee
title High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
title_short High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
title_full High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
title_fullStr High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
title_full_unstemmed High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
title_sort high versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of high versus low attenuation thresholds for determining the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules (GGNs) for the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). METHODS:Eighty-six pathologically confirmed GGNs < 3 cm observed in 86 patients (27 male, 59 female; mean age, 59.3 ± 11.0 years) between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively included. The solid component of each GGN was defined using two different attenuation thresholds: high (-160 Hounsfield units [HU]) and low (-400 HU). According to the presence or absence of solid portions, each GGN was categorized as a pure GGN or part-solid GGN. Solid components were regarded as indicators of invasive foci, suggesting MIA or IA. RESULTS:Among the 86 GGNs, there were 57 cases of IA, 19 of MIA, and 10 of AIS. Using the high attenuation threshold, 44 were categorized as pure GGNs and 42 as part-solid GGNs. Using the low attenuation threshold, 13 were categorized as pure GGNs and 73 as part-solid GGNs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for the invasive focus were 55.2%, 100%, 100%, 22.7%, and 60.4%, respectively, for the high attenuation threshold, and 93.4%, 80%, 97.2%, 61.5%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the low attenuation threshold. CONCLUSION:The low attenuation threshold was better than the conventional high attenuation threshold for determining the solid components of GGNs, which indicate invasive foci.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193644?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jaeholee highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT taehoonkim highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT sungsoolee highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT kyunghwahan highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT minkwangbyun highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT yoonsoochang highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT hyungjungkim highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT geundonglee highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
AT chulhwanpark highversuslowattenuationthresholdstodeterminethesolidcomponentofgroundglassopacitynodules
_version_ 1724958437117263872