Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
Abstract Background The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) pro...
Main Authors: | Amal Yaseen Zaman, Serdar Coskun, Ahmed Abdullah Alsanie, Khalid Arab Awartani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Fertility Research and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y |
Similar Items
-
Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
by: Jennifer B. Bakkensen, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Comparing intramuscular progesterone, vaginal progesterone and 17 -hydroxyprogestrone caproate in IVF and ICSI cycle
by: Ashraf Moini, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Comparison of pregnancy rates with intramuscular and vaginal progesterone use for luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
by: Murat Isikalan, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Luteal Phase Support Using Subcutaneous Progesterone: A Systematic Review
by: Alessandro Conforti, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Progesterone hypersensitivity: A challenge for luteal support
by: Astha Gupta, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)