Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?

Surgery among patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and venous disease has emerged as a viable strategy to achieve curative treatment. By definition, these patients are at increased risk of a positive resection margin, however, controversy exists with regards to necessity of r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rupaly Pandé, Keith J. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01060/full
id doaj-3dd9f4136f9341f58f7ddb18e30897c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3dd9f4136f9341f58f7ddb18e30897c42020-11-25T00:04:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2019-10-01910.3389/fonc.2019.01060483390Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?Rupaly Pandé0Keith J. Roberts1Keith J. Roberts2Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomDepartment of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomDepartment of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomSurgery among patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and venous disease has emerged as a viable strategy to achieve curative treatment. By definition, these patients are at increased risk of a positive resection margin, however, controversy exists with regards to necessity of radical surgery and optimum pathways with no consensus on definitive treatment. A surgery first approach is possible though outcomes vary but patients can have an efficient pathway to surgery, particularly if biliary drainage is avoided which limits overall complications. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is emerging as a widely used strategy to improve oncological outcomes, including resection margin status. However, some patients progress on NAT whilst others suffer major complications whilst elderly patients are unlikely to be offered effective NAT limiting the widespread applicability of this therapy. In this article an overview of the entire pathway is presented along with assimilation of current best evidence to determine optimal routes to surgery for BRPC with venous involvement.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01060/fullborderline resectable pancreaic adenocarcinomavein resection and reconstructionneoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapiesupfront surgeryfast track surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rupaly Pandé
Keith J. Roberts
Keith J. Roberts
spellingShingle Rupaly Pandé
Keith J. Roberts
Keith J. Roberts
Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
Frontiers in Oncology
borderline resectable pancreaic adenocarcinoma
vein resection and reconstruction
neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies
upfront surgery
fast track surgery
author_facet Rupaly Pandé
Keith J. Roberts
Keith J. Roberts
author_sort Rupaly Pandé
title Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
title_short Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
title_full Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
title_fullStr Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
title_full_unstemmed Determining Optimal Routes to Surgery for Borderline Resectable Venous Pancreatic Cancer—Where Is the Least Harm and Most Benefit?
title_sort determining optimal routes to surgery for borderline resectable venous pancreatic cancer—where is the least harm and most benefit?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Surgery among patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and venous disease has emerged as a viable strategy to achieve curative treatment. By definition, these patients are at increased risk of a positive resection margin, however, controversy exists with regards to necessity of radical surgery and optimum pathways with no consensus on definitive treatment. A surgery first approach is possible though outcomes vary but patients can have an efficient pathway to surgery, particularly if biliary drainage is avoided which limits overall complications. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is emerging as a widely used strategy to improve oncological outcomes, including resection margin status. However, some patients progress on NAT whilst others suffer major complications whilst elderly patients are unlikely to be offered effective NAT limiting the widespread applicability of this therapy. In this article an overview of the entire pathway is presented along with assimilation of current best evidence to determine optimal routes to surgery for BRPC with venous involvement.
topic borderline resectable pancreaic adenocarcinoma
vein resection and reconstruction
neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies
upfront surgery
fast track surgery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01060/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rupalypande determiningoptimalroutestosurgeryforborderlineresectablevenouspancreaticcancerwhereistheleastharmandmostbenefit
AT keithjroberts determiningoptimalroutestosurgeryforborderlineresectablevenouspancreaticcancerwhereistheleastharmandmostbenefit
AT keithjroberts determiningoptimalroutestosurgeryforborderlineresectablevenouspancreaticcancerwhereistheleastharmandmostbenefit
_version_ 1725430677693792256