WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION?
The present text demonstrates the unsustainability of a traditional view within the General Theory of the Process capable of defending the permanence of mere and insufficient duty of motivation of judicial decisions. Thus, using a methodology aimed at reviewing literature on the subject, based on a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30920 |
id |
doaj-3dea35cef8c946ffa1f53596c439d2b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3dea35cef8c946ffa1f53596c439d2b92020-11-25T03:14:57ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942018-08-0113275477410.5902/198136943092015326WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION?Flávio Quinaud Pedron0Professor Adjunto do Mestrado em Direito e da Graduação da Faculdade Guanambi (Bahia). Professor Adjunto da PUC-Minas (Graduação e Pós-graduação). Professor Adjunto do IBMEC. Editor-Chefe da Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi. Membro do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual (IBDP). Membro da Associação Brasileira de Direito Processual Constitucional (ABDPC). Membro da Associação Brasileira de Direito Processual (ABDPro). Membro da Rede Brasileira de Direito e Literatura (RDL)The present text demonstrates the unsustainability of a traditional view within the General Theory of the Process capable of defending the permanence of mere and insufficient duty of motivation of judicial decisions. Thus, using a methodology aimed at reviewing literature on the subject, based on a critical historical reconstruction, we present the problematic reading of the thesis of free convincing motivated, based on a relation of adherence to an undemocratic procedural theory. Thus, it will be observed that the function of motivation is bound to an unconscious hermeneutic reading as to the occurrence of linguistic turn and attached to a positivist legal paradigm. Then, using the theoretical resources provided by Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Law as Integrity, we demonstrate how the democratic procedural paradigm can be properly understood, overcoming both a Positivist Law Theory as well as an undemocratic process. The direct consequence is the overcoming of the idea of motivation and its substitution for the understanding of what is a justified judicial provision.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30920livre convencimento judicialteoria do direito como integridaderonald dworkin. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Flávio Quinaud Pedron |
spellingShingle |
Flávio Quinaud Pedron WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM livre convencimento judicial teoria do direito como integridade ronald dworkin. |
author_facet |
Flávio Quinaud Pedron |
author_sort |
Flávio Quinaud Pedron |
title |
WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? |
title_short |
WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? |
title_full |
WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? |
title_fullStr |
WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHAT CRITICISMS DWORKIN'S LAW AS INTEGRITY THEORY CAN MAKE AGAINST THE THESIS OF FREE MOTIVATION OF THE JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION? |
title_sort |
what criticisms dworkin's law as integrity theory can make against the thesis of free motivation of the judicial adjudication? |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
series |
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
issn |
1981-3694 1981-3694 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
The present text demonstrates the unsustainability of a traditional view within the General Theory of the Process capable of defending the permanence of mere and insufficient duty of motivation of judicial decisions. Thus, using a methodology aimed at reviewing literature on the subject, based on a critical historical reconstruction, we present the problematic reading of the thesis of free convincing motivated, based on a relation of adherence to an undemocratic procedural theory. Thus, it will be observed that the function of motivation is bound to an unconscious hermeneutic reading as to the occurrence of linguistic turn and attached to a positivist legal paradigm. Then, using the theoretical resources provided by Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Law as Integrity, we demonstrate how the democratic procedural paradigm can be properly understood, overcoming both a Positivist Law Theory as well as an undemocratic process. The direct consequence is the overcoming of the idea of motivation and its substitution for the understanding of what is a justified judicial provision. |
topic |
livre convencimento judicial teoria do direito como integridade ronald dworkin. |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30920 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT flavioquinaudpedron whatcriticismsdworkinslawasintegritytheorycanmakeagainstthethesisoffreemotivationofthejudicialadjudication |
_version_ |
1724641432216535040 |