Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)

According to the 2011 edition of the National Footprint Accounts (NFA) published by the Global Footprint Network (GFN), humankind consumed the resources and services of 1.5 planets in 2008; the corresponding number in 1961 was 0.7 planets. North Americans have an ecological footprint of 8.7 global h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yung-Jaan Lee, Li-Pei Peng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/6170
id doaj-3e00860e08f640bfbf806aef4a52947f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e00860e08f640bfbf806aef4a52947f2020-11-24T21:57:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502014-09-01696170618710.3390/su6096170su6096170Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)Yung-Jaan Lee0Li-Pei Peng1Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, No. 75 Chang-Hsing Street, Taipei 10672, TaiwanDepartment of Bio-Industry Communication and Development, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, TaiwanAccording to the 2011 edition of the National Footprint Accounts (NFA) published by the Global Footprint Network (GFN), humankind consumed the resources and services of 1.5 planets in 2008; the corresponding number in 1961 was 0.7 planets. North Americans have an ecological footprint of 8.7 global hectares per person whereas Africans have a footprint of only 1.4 global hectares per person. The global mean biological capacity is only 1.8 global hectares per person so human beings are overshooting ecological resources. The ecological footprint measures the resources that are consumed by humans from the biosphere, and serves as an index of the sustainability of development. The NFA includes the ecological footprints of over 200 countries and regions, but not Taiwan. Hence, Taiwan must establish and update its own ecological footprint databases. Ecological footprint is one indicator of the sustainability of development, and can be compared across nations. This study extends previous studies by analyzing Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011. With reference to the ecological footprint accounts of the Global Footprint Network and the Taiwan’s ecological footprint analysis for 1997–2007, this study presents Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011. Most of the data that are used herein are taken from the Food and Agriculture Organization, the International Energy Agency, Taiwan’s Council of Agriculture and Taiwan’s National Development Council. The results thus obtained reveal that Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011 exceeded that from 1997–2007. To respond to this trend toward un-sustainable development and to help Taiwan move toward sustainability, carbon reduction and energy saving policies should be implemented to effectively manage Taiwan’s ecological resources.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/6170ecological footprintbiological capacityecological deficit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yung-Jaan Lee
Li-Pei Peng
spellingShingle Yung-Jaan Lee
Li-Pei Peng
Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
Sustainability
ecological footprint
biological capacity
ecological deficit
author_facet Yung-Jaan Lee
Li-Pei Peng
author_sort Yung-Jaan Lee
title Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
title_short Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
title_full Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
title_fullStr Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
title_full_unstemmed Taiwan’s Ecological Footprint (1994–2011)
title_sort taiwan’s ecological footprint (1994–2011)
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2014-09-01
description According to the 2011 edition of the National Footprint Accounts (NFA) published by the Global Footprint Network (GFN), humankind consumed the resources and services of 1.5 planets in 2008; the corresponding number in 1961 was 0.7 planets. North Americans have an ecological footprint of 8.7 global hectares per person whereas Africans have a footprint of only 1.4 global hectares per person. The global mean biological capacity is only 1.8 global hectares per person so human beings are overshooting ecological resources. The ecological footprint measures the resources that are consumed by humans from the biosphere, and serves as an index of the sustainability of development. The NFA includes the ecological footprints of over 200 countries and regions, but not Taiwan. Hence, Taiwan must establish and update its own ecological footprint databases. Ecological footprint is one indicator of the sustainability of development, and can be compared across nations. This study extends previous studies by analyzing Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011. With reference to the ecological footprint accounts of the Global Footprint Network and the Taiwan’s ecological footprint analysis for 1997–2007, this study presents Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011. Most of the data that are used herein are taken from the Food and Agriculture Organization, the International Energy Agency, Taiwan’s Council of Agriculture and Taiwan’s National Development Council. The results thus obtained reveal that Taiwan’s ecological footprint from 2008–2011 exceeded that from 1997–2007. To respond to this trend toward un-sustainable development and to help Taiwan move toward sustainability, carbon reduction and energy saving policies should be implemented to effectively manage Taiwan’s ecological resources.
topic ecological footprint
biological capacity
ecological deficit
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/6170
work_keys_str_mv AT yungjaanlee taiwansecologicalfootprint19942011
AT lipeipeng taiwansecologicalfootprint19942011
_version_ 1725854619326742528