Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM

Besides accuracy, integrity is another important performance measure of GNSS. The classical least-squares-residual (LSR) method and parity vector (PV) method are often used in the receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM). The two fault detection methods assume that the observation errors of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaping Ma, Kegen Yu, Jean-Philippe Montillet, Xiaoxing He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2019-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8764428/
id doaj-3e13b2d84c004bdfb318ae72c9f13ebb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e13b2d84c004bdfb318ae72c9f13ebb2021-04-05T17:11:51ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-017978039781410.1109/ACCESS.2019.29290738764428Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIMXiaping Ma0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-3871Kegen Yu1Jean-Philippe Montillet2Xiaoxing He3School of Geomatics, Xi&#x2019;an University of Science and Technology, Xi&#x2019;an, ChinaSchool of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandState Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Engineering Informatization, FSDI, Xi&#x2019;an, ChinaBesides accuracy, integrity is another important performance measure of GNSS. The classical least-squares-residual (LSR) method and parity vector (PV) method are often used in the receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM). The two fault detection methods assume that the observation errors of different satellites are the same, ignoring possible variations of accuracy between observations. In this study, the mathematical models of the weighted least-squares-residual (WLSR) method and the weighted parity vector (WPV) method are derived in detail. The equivalence of the two methods is established with statistical tests. The WPV method is applied to detect those faults based on both GPS and BDS observations collected at Wuhan JiuFeng Station (JFNG). The theoretical results show that this method has lower computational complexity than the WLSR method, hence more suited for cases requiring fast fault detection. The fault detection rate increases as the deviation of the pseudorange observation increases. Thus, using the threshold value T<sub>d</sub> of the posterior unit weight error &#x03C3;&#x0302;<sub>0</sub>, the WPV achieves a higher fault detection rate than using a priori unit weight error &#x03C3;<sub>0</sub>. The experiments show that these two methods can detect relatively large faults, it is possible to detect them in GPS observations if &#x03C3;<sub>0</sub> is more than 12&#x00D7;bias (1&#x00D7;bias=8 m) and &#x03C3;&#x0302;<sub>0</sub> superior to 4&#x00D7;bias, whereas the faults detection in BDS observations requires a deviation bigger than 8&#x00D7;bias and 6&#x00D7;bias, respectively. But these two methods are insensitive when the deviation is smaller.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8764428/Weighted least-squares-residualweighted parity vectorsreceiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM)fault detection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaping Ma
Kegen Yu
Jean-Philippe Montillet
Xiaoxing He
spellingShingle Xiaping Ma
Kegen Yu
Jean-Philippe Montillet
Xiaoxing He
Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
IEEE Access
Weighted least-squares-residual
weighted parity vectors
receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM)
fault detection
author_facet Xiaping Ma
Kegen Yu
Jean-Philippe Montillet
Xiaoxing He
author_sort Xiaping Ma
title Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
title_short Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
title_full Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
title_fullStr Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
title_full_unstemmed Equivalence Proof and Performance Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Residual Method and Weighted Parity Vector Method in RAIM
title_sort equivalence proof and performance analysis of weighted least squares residual method and weighted parity vector method in raim
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Besides accuracy, integrity is another important performance measure of GNSS. The classical least-squares-residual (LSR) method and parity vector (PV) method are often used in the receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM). The two fault detection methods assume that the observation errors of different satellites are the same, ignoring possible variations of accuracy between observations. In this study, the mathematical models of the weighted least-squares-residual (WLSR) method and the weighted parity vector (WPV) method are derived in detail. The equivalence of the two methods is established with statistical tests. The WPV method is applied to detect those faults based on both GPS and BDS observations collected at Wuhan JiuFeng Station (JFNG). The theoretical results show that this method has lower computational complexity than the WLSR method, hence more suited for cases requiring fast fault detection. The fault detection rate increases as the deviation of the pseudorange observation increases. Thus, using the threshold value T<sub>d</sub> of the posterior unit weight error &#x03C3;&#x0302;<sub>0</sub>, the WPV achieves a higher fault detection rate than using a priori unit weight error &#x03C3;<sub>0</sub>. The experiments show that these two methods can detect relatively large faults, it is possible to detect them in GPS observations if &#x03C3;<sub>0</sub> is more than 12&#x00D7;bias (1&#x00D7;bias=8 m) and &#x03C3;&#x0302;<sub>0</sub> superior to 4&#x00D7;bias, whereas the faults detection in BDS observations requires a deviation bigger than 8&#x00D7;bias and 6&#x00D7;bias, respectively. But these two methods are insensitive when the deviation is smaller.
topic Weighted least-squares-residual
weighted parity vectors
receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM)
fault detection
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8764428/
work_keys_str_mv AT xiapingma equivalenceproofandperformanceanalysisofweightedleastsquaresresidualmethodandweightedparityvectormethodinraim
AT kegenyu equivalenceproofandperformanceanalysisofweightedleastsquaresresidualmethodandweightedparityvectormethodinraim
AT jeanphilippemontillet equivalenceproofandperformanceanalysisofweightedleastsquaresresidualmethodandweightedparityvectormethodinraim
AT xiaoxinghe equivalenceproofandperformanceanalysisofweightedleastsquaresresidualmethodandweightedparityvectormethodinraim
_version_ 1721540121310789632