The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU

One of the main lessons to be learned from the Greek crisis is that large scale supranational communitarisation is a danger for democracy if mutual obligations between members undermine substantially the possibilities of political choice for the single member states. I argue that a well-balanced rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolf-Jürgen Cramm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Complutense de Madrid 2016-06-01
Series:Las Torres de Lucca
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lastorresdelucca.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/89
id doaj-3eb73397d44b49368c67d73573c53b67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3eb73397d44b49368c67d73573c53b672020-11-24T22:05:55ZengUniversidad Complutense de MadridLas Torres de Lucca2255-38272016-06-015894076The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EUWolf-Jürgen Cramm0Bern UniversityOne of the main lessons to be learned from the Greek crisis is that large scale supranational communitarisation is a danger for democracy if mutual obligations between members undermine substantially the possibilities of political choice for the single member states. I argue that a well-balanced relation between (self-) responsibility, solidarity, performance incentives and democracy involves taking subsidiarity serious, as well as to admit a certain amount of institutional flexibility. This flexibility is demanded especially in the case of large scale communities which include countries as members, like the EU, and in which the basic ideas of social, economical and financial policy are rather heterogeneous. Democracy, responsibility and solidarity must be in a well balanced relation for any community to function and to be generally acceptable to the citizens. This includes the defence of rather ambitious forms of civil participation and sovereignty of the people against the paternalistic pretensions of experts or of political and cultural elites. And responsibility ―as a basic condition for democracy― requires that the design of the contractual basis of the EU must make possible that voting communities really assume responsibility for their decisions, which includes bearing possible negative consequences of these decision on themselves. Preserving a certain leeway for differing decisions about economical, financial or social questions is necessary for giving democratic substance to the demand of the primacy of politics. This puts serious limits to ambitions for treaty-based supranational communitisations.http://lastorresdelucca.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/89Europe, crisis, Greece, democracy, responsibility, solidarity, justice, community, subsidiarity, reform, paternalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolf-Jürgen Cramm
spellingShingle Wolf-Jürgen Cramm
The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
Las Torres de Lucca
Europe, crisis, Greece, democracy, responsibility, solidarity, justice, community, subsidiarity, reform, paternalism
author_facet Wolf-Jürgen Cramm
author_sort Wolf-Jürgen Cramm
title The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
title_short The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
title_full The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
title_fullStr The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
title_full_unstemmed The Interrelation Between Democracy and Responsibility: The Greek Crisis as a Paradigm Case for the EU
title_sort interrelation between democracy and responsibility: the greek crisis as a paradigm case for the eu
publisher Universidad Complutense de Madrid
series Las Torres de Lucca
issn 2255-3827
publishDate 2016-06-01
description One of the main lessons to be learned from the Greek crisis is that large scale supranational communitarisation is a danger for democracy if mutual obligations between members undermine substantially the possibilities of political choice for the single member states. I argue that a well-balanced relation between (self-) responsibility, solidarity, performance incentives and democracy involves taking subsidiarity serious, as well as to admit a certain amount of institutional flexibility. This flexibility is demanded especially in the case of large scale communities which include countries as members, like the EU, and in which the basic ideas of social, economical and financial policy are rather heterogeneous. Democracy, responsibility and solidarity must be in a well balanced relation for any community to function and to be generally acceptable to the citizens. This includes the defence of rather ambitious forms of civil participation and sovereignty of the people against the paternalistic pretensions of experts or of political and cultural elites. And responsibility ―as a basic condition for democracy― requires that the design of the contractual basis of the EU must make possible that voting communities really assume responsibility for their decisions, which includes bearing possible negative consequences of these decision on themselves. Preserving a certain leeway for differing decisions about economical, financial or social questions is necessary for giving democratic substance to the demand of the primacy of politics. This puts serious limits to ambitions for treaty-based supranational communitisations.
topic Europe, crisis, Greece, democracy, responsibility, solidarity, justice, community, subsidiarity, reform, paternalism
url http://lastorresdelucca.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/89
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfjurgencramm theinterrelationbetweendemocracyandresponsibilitythegreekcrisisasaparadigmcasefortheeu
AT wolfjurgencramm interrelationbetweendemocracyandresponsibilitythegreekcrisisasaparadigmcasefortheeu
_version_ 1725824080264822784