Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Willem Eduard Frankenhuis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00172/full
id doaj-3eb7753f66184b2d91809782092be57c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3eb7753f66184b2d91809782092be57c2020-11-24T23:17:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782010-11-01110.3389/fpsyg.2010.001727998Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?Willem Eduard Frankenhuis0UCLAhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00172/fullAttachment stylesEvolutionary developmental psychologyGroup selection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Willem Eduard Frankenhuis
spellingShingle Willem Eduard Frankenhuis
Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
Frontiers in Psychology
Attachment styles
Evolutionary developmental psychology
Group selection
author_facet Willem Eduard Frankenhuis
author_sort Willem Eduard Frankenhuis
title Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
title_short Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
title_full Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
title_fullStr Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
title_full_unstemmed Did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
title_sort did insecure attachment styles evolve for the benefit of the group?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2010-11-01
topic Attachment styles
Evolutionary developmental psychology
Group selection
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00172/full
work_keys_str_mv AT willemeduardfrankenhuis didinsecureattachmentstylesevolveforthebenefitofthegroup
_version_ 1725584430867677184