A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation

Dead fuel moisture content (DFMC) is a key driver for fire occurrence and is often an important input to many fire simulation models. There are two main approaches to estimating DFMC: empirical and process-based models. The former mainly relies on empirical methods to build relationships between the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunquan Fan, Binbin He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/933
id doaj-3ee9b9e0325b45d0968d750e512e6d1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ee9b9e0325b45d0968d750e512e6d1b2021-07-23T13:41:22ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-07-011293393310.3390/f12070933A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content EstimationChunquan Fan0Binbin He1School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, ChinaDead fuel moisture content (DFMC) is a key driver for fire occurrence and is often an important input to many fire simulation models. There are two main approaches to estimating DFMC: empirical and process-based models. The former mainly relies on empirical methods to build relationships between the input drivers (weather, fuel and site characteristics) and observed DFMC. The latter attempts to simulate the processes that occur in the fuel with energy and water balance conservation equations. However, empirical models lack explanations for physical processes, and process-based models may provide an incomplete representation of DFMC. To combine the benefits of empirical and process-based models, here we introduced the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and its combination with an effective physics process-based model fuel stick moisture model (FSMM) to estimate DFMC. The LSTM network showed its powerful ability in describing the temporal dynamic changes of DFMC with high <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> (0.91), low RMSE (3.24%) and MAE (1.97%). When combined with a FSMM model, the physics-guided model FSMM-LSTM showed betterperformance (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.96, RMSE = 2.21% and MAE = 1.41%) compared with the other models. Therefore, the combination of the physics process and deep learning estimated 10-h DFMC more accurately, allowing the improvement of wildfire risk assessments and fire simulating.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/933dead fuel moisture content (DFMC)deep learningFSMM-LSTMLSTMwildfires
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chunquan Fan
Binbin He
spellingShingle Chunquan Fan
Binbin He
A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
Forests
dead fuel moisture content (DFMC)
deep learning
FSMM-LSTM
LSTM
wildfires
author_facet Chunquan Fan
Binbin He
author_sort Chunquan Fan
title A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
title_short A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
title_full A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
title_fullStr A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
title_full_unstemmed A Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for 10-h Dead Fuel Moisture Content Estimation
title_sort physics-guided deep learning model for 10-h dead fuel moisture content estimation
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Dead fuel moisture content (DFMC) is a key driver for fire occurrence and is often an important input to many fire simulation models. There are two main approaches to estimating DFMC: empirical and process-based models. The former mainly relies on empirical methods to build relationships between the input drivers (weather, fuel and site characteristics) and observed DFMC. The latter attempts to simulate the processes that occur in the fuel with energy and water balance conservation equations. However, empirical models lack explanations for physical processes, and process-based models may provide an incomplete representation of DFMC. To combine the benefits of empirical and process-based models, here we introduced the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and its combination with an effective physics process-based model fuel stick moisture model (FSMM) to estimate DFMC. The LSTM network showed its powerful ability in describing the temporal dynamic changes of DFMC with high <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> (0.91), low RMSE (3.24%) and MAE (1.97%). When combined with a FSMM model, the physics-guided model FSMM-LSTM showed betterperformance (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.96, RMSE = 2.21% and MAE = 1.41%) compared with the other models. Therefore, the combination of the physics process and deep learning estimated 10-h DFMC more accurately, allowing the improvement of wildfire risk assessments and fire simulating.
topic dead fuel moisture content (DFMC)
deep learning
FSMM-LSTM
LSTM
wildfires
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/933
work_keys_str_mv AT chunquanfan aphysicsguideddeeplearningmodelfor10hdeadfuelmoisturecontentestimation
AT binbinhe aphysicsguideddeeplearningmodelfor10hdeadfuelmoisturecontentestimation
AT chunquanfan physicsguideddeeplearningmodelfor10hdeadfuelmoisturecontentestimation
AT binbinhe physicsguideddeeplearningmodelfor10hdeadfuelmoisturecontentestimation
_version_ 1721288340742864896