Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study

BackgroundExisting studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther, Geerlings, Jasmijn A, Muntingh, Anna DT, Scholten, Willemijn D, Maarsingh, Otto R, van Straten, Annemieke, Batelaan, Neeltje M, van Meijel, Berno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-02-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:http://formative.jmir.org/2021/2/e23200/
id doaj-3f24c764f74146d1897691fd3de444f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f24c764f74146d1897691fd3de444f72021-04-02T21:36:07ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2021-02-0152e2320010.2196/23200Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative StudyKrijnen-de Bruin, EstherGeerlings, Jasmijn AMuntingh, Anna DTScholten, Willemijn DMaarsingh, Otto Rvan Straten, AnnemiekeBatelaan, Neeltje Mvan Meijel, Berno BackgroundExisting studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and implementation of interventions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the GET READY relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in general practice. MethodsSemistructured interviews (N=26) and focus group interviews (N=2) with patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) in the Netherlands were performed. Patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders and their MHPs who participated in the GET READY study were interviewed individually. Findings from the interviews were tested in focus group interviews with patients and MHPs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsParticipants were positive about the program because it created awareness of relapse risks. Lack of motivation, lack of recognizability, lack of support from the MHP, and symptom severity (too low or too high) appeared to be limiting factors in the use of the program. MHPs play a crucial role in motivating and supporting patients in relapse prevention. The perspectives of patients and MHPs were largely in accordance, although they had different perspectives concerning responsibilities for taking initiative. ConclusionsThe implementation of the GET READY program was challenging. Guidance from MHPs should be offered for relapse prevention programs based on eHealth. Both MHPs and patients should align their expectations concerning responsibilities in advance to ensure optimal usage. Usage of blended relapse prevention programs may be further enhanced by diagnosis-specific programs and easily accessible support from MHPs. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6http://formative.jmir.org/2021/2/e23200/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
spellingShingle Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
JMIR Formative Research
author_facet Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
author_sort Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
title Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_short Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_full Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_sort evaluation of a blended relapse prevention program for anxiety and depression in general practice: qualitative study
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Formative Research
issn 2561-326X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description BackgroundExisting studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and implementation of interventions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the GET READY relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in general practice. MethodsSemistructured interviews (N=26) and focus group interviews (N=2) with patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) in the Netherlands were performed. Patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders and their MHPs who participated in the GET READY study were interviewed individually. Findings from the interviews were tested in focus group interviews with patients and MHPs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsParticipants were positive about the program because it created awareness of relapse risks. Lack of motivation, lack of recognizability, lack of support from the MHP, and symptom severity (too low or too high) appeared to be limiting factors in the use of the program. MHPs play a crucial role in motivating and supporting patients in relapse prevention. The perspectives of patients and MHPs were largely in accordance, although they had different perspectives concerning responsibilities for taking initiative. ConclusionsThe implementation of the GET READY program was challenging. Guidance from MHPs should be offered for relapse prevention programs based on eHealth. Both MHPs and patients should align their expectations concerning responsibilities in advance to ensure optimal usage. Usage of blended relapse prevention programs may be further enhanced by diagnosis-specific programs and easily accessible support from MHPs. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6
url http://formative.jmir.org/2021/2/e23200/
work_keys_str_mv AT krijnendebruinesther evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT geerlingsjasmijna evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT muntinghannadt evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT scholtenwillemijnd evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT maarsinghottor evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT vanstratenannemieke evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT batelaanneeltjem evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT vanmeijelberno evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
_version_ 1721544937799942144