Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior

Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) refers to the process of a Pavlovian reward-paired cue acquiring incentive motivational proprieties that drive choices. It represents a crucial phenomenon for understanding cue-controlled behavior, and it has both adaptive and maladaptive implications (i.e.,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara eGarofalo, Giuseppe edi Pellegrino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00163/full
id doaj-3f2f5ce2621b4f0a9f5baa0ce43e425e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f2f5ce2621b4f0a9f5baa0ce43e425e2020-11-24T22:05:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532015-06-01910.3389/fnbeh.2015.00163146943Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behaviorSara eGarofalo0Sara eGarofalo1Sara eGarofalo2Giuseppe edi Pellegrino3Cambridge UniversityUniversity of BolognaUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of BolognaPavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) refers to the process of a Pavlovian reward-paired cue acquiring incentive motivational proprieties that drive choices. It represents a crucial phenomenon for understanding cue-controlled behavior, and it has both adaptive and maladaptive implications (i.e., drug-taking). In animals, individual differences in the degree to which such cues bias performance have been identified in two types of individuals that exhibit distinct Conditioned Responses during Pavlovian conditioning: Sign-Trackers (ST) and Goal-Trackers (GT). Using an appetitive PIT procedure with a monetary reward, the present study investigated, for the first time, the extent to which such individual differences might affect the influence of reward-paired cues in humans. In a first task, participants learned an instrumental response leading to reward; then, in a second task, a visual Pavlovian cue was associated with the same reward; finally, in a third task, PIT was tested by measuring the preference for the reward-paired instrumental response when the task-irrelevant reward-paired cue was presented, in the absence of the reward itself. In ST individuals, but not in GT individuals, reward-related cues biased behavior, resulting in an increased likelihood to perform the instrumental response independently paired with the same reward when presented with the task-irrelevant reward-paired cue, even if the reward itself was no longer available (i.e., stronger PIT effect). This finding has important implications for developing individualized treatment for maladaptive behaviors, such as addiction.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00163/fullreinforcement learningpavlovian-to-instrumental transferGoal-trackerSign-trackercue-controlled behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Giuseppe edi Pellegrino
spellingShingle Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Giuseppe edi Pellegrino
Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
reinforcement learning
pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer
Goal-tracker
Sign-tracker
cue-controlled behavior
author_facet Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Sara eGarofalo
Giuseppe edi Pellegrino
author_sort Sara eGarofalo
title Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
title_short Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
title_full Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
title_fullStr Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant Pavlovian cues on human behavior
title_sort individual differences in the influence of task-irrelevant pavlovian cues on human behavior
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) refers to the process of a Pavlovian reward-paired cue acquiring incentive motivational proprieties that drive choices. It represents a crucial phenomenon for understanding cue-controlled behavior, and it has both adaptive and maladaptive implications (i.e., drug-taking). In animals, individual differences in the degree to which such cues bias performance have been identified in two types of individuals that exhibit distinct Conditioned Responses during Pavlovian conditioning: Sign-Trackers (ST) and Goal-Trackers (GT). Using an appetitive PIT procedure with a monetary reward, the present study investigated, for the first time, the extent to which such individual differences might affect the influence of reward-paired cues in humans. In a first task, participants learned an instrumental response leading to reward; then, in a second task, a visual Pavlovian cue was associated with the same reward; finally, in a third task, PIT was tested by measuring the preference for the reward-paired instrumental response when the task-irrelevant reward-paired cue was presented, in the absence of the reward itself. In ST individuals, but not in GT individuals, reward-related cues biased behavior, resulting in an increased likelihood to perform the instrumental response independently paired with the same reward when presented with the task-irrelevant reward-paired cue, even if the reward itself was no longer available (i.e., stronger PIT effect). This finding has important implications for developing individualized treatment for maladaptive behaviors, such as addiction.
topic reinforcement learning
pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer
Goal-tracker
Sign-tracker
cue-controlled behavior
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00163/full
work_keys_str_mv AT saraegarofalo individualdifferencesintheinfluenceoftaskirrelevantpavloviancuesonhumanbehavior
AT saraegarofalo individualdifferencesintheinfluenceoftaskirrelevantpavloviancuesonhumanbehavior
AT saraegarofalo individualdifferencesintheinfluenceoftaskirrelevantpavloviancuesonhumanbehavior
AT giuseppeedipellegrino individualdifferencesintheinfluenceoftaskirrelevantpavloviancuesonhumanbehavior
_version_ 1725825253097078784