Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>

This paper provides an overview of fertility data for Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Particular attention is given to the availability of order-specific fertility data. We discuss the quality of data provided by the Statistical Offices, both birth registration data and censuses or microcensuses....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michaela Kreyenfeld, Kryštof Zeman, Marion Burkimsher, Ina Jaschinski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Federal Institute for Population Research 2012-01-01
Series:Comparative Population Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CPoS/article/view/62
id doaj-3f48ce6ecc034bea953337bfd60c4bc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f48ce6ecc034bea953337bfd60c4bc02021-08-02T01:23:30ZengFederal Institute for Population ResearchComparative Population Studies1869-89801869-89992012-01-01362-330Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>Michaela KreyenfeldKryštof ZemanMarion BurkimsherIna JaschinskiThis paper provides an overview of fertility data for Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Particular attention is given to the availability of order-specific fertility data. We discuss the quality of data provided by the Statistical Offices, both birth registration data and censuses or microcensuses. In addition, we explore how social science surveys can be used to generate order-specific fertility indicators, and compare survey fertility estimates with estimates from vital statistics. Prior studies have shown that there is a “family bias” in most surveys, with the fertility of younger cohorts being overstated, because respondents with young children are easier to reach by interviewers. Our assessment of various types of surveys from the three countries mostly supports this notion. The “family bias” is most pronounced in family surveys in contrast to all-purpose surveys. Weighting data does not fully cure the “family bias”, which we attribute to the fact that the number of children is usually not considered a factor in calculating sample weights, as provided by the survey agencies and Statistical Offices. The confounding role of migration in the production of reliable and comparable fertility statistics is also discussed.http://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CPoS/article/view/62FertilityGermanyAustriaSwitzerland
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michaela Kreyenfeld
Kryštof Zeman
Marion Burkimsher
Ina Jaschinski
spellingShingle Michaela Kreyenfeld
Kryštof Zeman
Marion Burkimsher
Ina Jaschinski
Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
Comparative Population Studies
Fertility
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
author_facet Michaela Kreyenfeld
Kryštof Zeman
Marion Burkimsher
Ina Jaschinski
author_sort Michaela Kreyenfeld
title Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
title_short Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
title_full Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
title_fullStr Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
title_full_unstemmed Fertility Data for German-speaking Countries:<br>What is the Potential? Where are the Pitfalls?<br>
title_sort fertility data for german-speaking countries:<br>what is the potential? where are the pitfalls?<br>
publisher Federal Institute for Population Research
series Comparative Population Studies
issn 1869-8980
1869-8999
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This paper provides an overview of fertility data for Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Particular attention is given to the availability of order-specific fertility data. We discuss the quality of data provided by the Statistical Offices, both birth registration data and censuses or microcensuses. In addition, we explore how social science surveys can be used to generate order-specific fertility indicators, and compare survey fertility estimates with estimates from vital statistics. Prior studies have shown that there is a “family bias” in most surveys, with the fertility of younger cohorts being overstated, because respondents with young children are easier to reach by interviewers. Our assessment of various types of surveys from the three countries mostly supports this notion. The “family bias” is most pronounced in family surveys in contrast to all-purpose surveys. Weighting data does not fully cure the “family bias”, which we attribute to the fact that the number of children is usually not considered a factor in calculating sample weights, as provided by the survey agencies and Statistical Offices. The confounding role of migration in the production of reliable and comparable fertility statistics is also discussed.
topic Fertility
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
url http://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CPoS/article/view/62
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelakreyenfeld fertilitydataforgermanspeakingcountriesbrwhatisthepotentialwherearethepitfallsbr
AT krystofzeman fertilitydataforgermanspeakingcountriesbrwhatisthepotentialwherearethepitfallsbr
AT marionburkimsher fertilitydataforgermanspeakingcountriesbrwhatisthepotentialwherearethepitfallsbr
AT inajaschinski fertilitydataforgermanspeakingcountriesbrwhatisthepotentialwherearethepitfallsbr
_version_ 1721244811948720128