“Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology

I am not concerned with whether Heidegger’s philosophy is a "secularisation" of primitive Christianity buried beneath the excrescence of a dead medieval Scholasticism and the "ontotheological constitution of its metaphysics". Nor I am concerned with seeking out the theological ro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajesh Sampath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The International Academic Forum 2015-10-01
Series:IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-ethics-religion-and-philosophy/volume-2-issue-1/article-4/
id doaj-3f5f03fcd9164c508063eaf33b946404
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f5f03fcd9164c508063eaf33b9464042020-11-24T20:56:03ZengThe International Academic ForumIAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy2187-06242187-06242015-10-0121404910.22492/ijerp.2.1.04“Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian TheologyRajesh Sampath0Brandeis University, United States of AmericaI am not concerned with whether Heidegger’s philosophy is a "secularisation" of primitive Christianity buried beneath the excrescence of a dead medieval Scholasticism and the "ontotheological constitution of its metaphysics". Nor I am concerned with seeking out the theological roots of Heidegger’s philosophy even though he and others may claim that his philosophy is rabidly a-theistic. To repeat, this paper is not interested in intellectual history and or a genealogical reconstruction of Heidegger’s true intentions and the contradictions that are displayed in his published works and what that could mean for the relation between theology and the philosophy of religion. We have to tread a path, making it new, as opposed to discovering a new path that has yet to be taken. Creation is harder than discovery; the former is active and intentional, albeit obscure, and the latter is passive, even accidental, albeit something that can be more readily followed.https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-ethics-religion-and-philosophy/volume-2-issue-1/article-4/temporalityhistoricalityHeideggerBeing and TimeChristianity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajesh Sampath
spellingShingle Rajesh Sampath
“Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy
temporality
historicality
Heidegger
Being and Time
Christianity
author_facet Rajesh Sampath
author_sort Rajesh Sampath
title “Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
title_short “Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
title_full “Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
title_fullStr “Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
title_full_unstemmed “Temporality and Historicality” in Heidegger’s Being and Time as the Clue to the Origin of Christian Theology
title_sort “temporality and historicality” in heidegger’s being and time as the clue to the origin of christian theology
publisher The International Academic Forum
series IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy
issn 2187-0624
2187-0624
publishDate 2015-10-01
description I am not concerned with whether Heidegger’s philosophy is a "secularisation" of primitive Christianity buried beneath the excrescence of a dead medieval Scholasticism and the "ontotheological constitution of its metaphysics". Nor I am concerned with seeking out the theological roots of Heidegger’s philosophy even though he and others may claim that his philosophy is rabidly a-theistic. To repeat, this paper is not interested in intellectual history and or a genealogical reconstruction of Heidegger’s true intentions and the contradictions that are displayed in his published works and what that could mean for the relation between theology and the philosophy of religion. We have to tread a path, making it new, as opposed to discovering a new path that has yet to be taken. Creation is harder than discovery; the former is active and intentional, albeit obscure, and the latter is passive, even accidental, albeit something that can be more readily followed.
topic temporality
historicality
Heidegger
Being and Time
Christianity
url https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-ethics-religion-and-philosophy/volume-2-issue-1/article-4/
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshsampath temporalityandhistoricalityinheideggersbeingandtimeasthecluetotheoriginofchristiantheology
_version_ 1716790948337287168