Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot

Background: The Ponseti method has revolutionized the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot, but recurrence remains problematic. Dynamic supination is a common cause of recurrence, and the standard treatment is tibialis anterior tendon transfer using an external button. Although safe and effective, the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chanseok Rhee MD, Bernard Burgesson MD, Ben Orlik MD, FRCSC, Karl Logan MBChB, FRCS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420923591
id doaj-3f60b74ea30e47a7a6b65a2a565c0bf6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f60b74ea30e47a7a6b65a2a565c0bf62020-11-25T03:36:02ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142020-05-01510.1177/2473011420923591Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual ClubfootChanseok Rhee MD0Bernard Burgesson MD1Ben Orlik MD, FRCSC2Karl Logan MBChB, FRCS3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Nova Scotia, CanadaBackground: The Ponseti method has revolutionized the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot, but recurrence remains problematic. Dynamic supination is a common cause of recurrence, and the standard treatment is tibialis anterior tendon transfer using an external button. Although safe and effective, the placement of the button on the sole creates a pressure point, which can lead to skin ulceration. In our institution, a suture button has been used for the tibialis anterior tendon transfer and we report our results here. Methods: Two senior authors’ case logs were retrospectively reviewed to identify 23 patients (34 feet) for tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button. Complications and additional operative procedures were assessed by reviewing operative notes, follow-up visit clinic notes, and radiographs. The mean age of the patients was 6 years 2 months (SD 40 months) and the average follow-up duration was 67.1 weeks (SD 72 weeks). Results: There were 5 complications (14.7%). Recurrence occurred bilaterally in 1 patient (5.9%) but did not require reoperation. Other complications included a cast-related pressure sore (2.9%) and an infection (2.9%) requiring irrigation with debridement along with hardware removal. Conclusions: Tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button was a safe procedure with theoretical advantage of providing stronger fixation and reducing the risk of skin pressure necrosis compared to the standard external button technique. We believe a suture button could allow earlier rehabilitation and may afford stronger ankle eversion. Prospective studies are required to compare the differences in functional outcomes between the procedures. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series, therapeutic study.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420923591
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chanseok Rhee MD
Bernard Burgesson MD
Ben Orlik MD, FRCSC
Karl Logan MBChB, FRCS
spellingShingle Chanseok Rhee MD
Bernard Burgesson MD
Ben Orlik MD, FRCSC
Karl Logan MBChB, FRCS
Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet Chanseok Rhee MD
Bernard Burgesson MD
Ben Orlik MD, FRCSC
Karl Logan MBChB, FRCS
author_sort Chanseok Rhee MD
title Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
title_short Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
title_full Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
title_fullStr Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
title_full_unstemmed Suture Button Technique for Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Residual Clubfoot
title_sort suture button technique for tibialis anterior tendon transfer for the treatment of residual clubfoot
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background: The Ponseti method has revolutionized the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot, but recurrence remains problematic. Dynamic supination is a common cause of recurrence, and the standard treatment is tibialis anterior tendon transfer using an external button. Although safe and effective, the placement of the button on the sole creates a pressure point, which can lead to skin ulceration. In our institution, a suture button has been used for the tibialis anterior tendon transfer and we report our results here. Methods: Two senior authors’ case logs were retrospectively reviewed to identify 23 patients (34 feet) for tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button. Complications and additional operative procedures were assessed by reviewing operative notes, follow-up visit clinic notes, and radiographs. The mean age of the patients was 6 years 2 months (SD 40 months) and the average follow-up duration was 67.1 weeks (SD 72 weeks). Results: There were 5 complications (14.7%). Recurrence occurred bilaterally in 1 patient (5.9%) but did not require reoperation. Other complications included a cast-related pressure sore (2.9%) and an infection (2.9%) requiring irrigation with debridement along with hardware removal. Conclusions: Tibialis anterior tendon transfer using a suture button was a safe procedure with theoretical advantage of providing stronger fixation and reducing the risk of skin pressure necrosis compared to the standard external button technique. We believe a suture button could allow earlier rehabilitation and may afford stronger ankle eversion. Prospective studies are required to compare the differences in functional outcomes between the procedures. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series, therapeutic study.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420923591
work_keys_str_mv AT chanseokrheemd suturebuttontechniquefortibialisanteriortendontransferforthetreatmentofresidualclubfoot
AT bernardburgessonmd suturebuttontechniquefortibialisanteriortendontransferforthetreatmentofresidualclubfoot
AT benorlikmdfrcsc suturebuttontechniquefortibialisanteriortendontransferforthetreatmentofresidualclubfoot
AT karlloganmbchbfrcs suturebuttontechniquefortibialisanteriortendontransferforthetreatmentofresidualclubfoot
_version_ 1724551741080338432