Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003

Abstract Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Hanspeter Naegeli, Andrew Nicholas Birch, Josep Casacuberta, Adinda De Schrijver, Mikołaj Antoni Gralak, Huw Jones, Barbara Manachini, Antoine Messéan, Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen, Fabien Nogué, Christophe Robaglia, Nils Rostoks, Jeremy Sweet, Christoph Tebbe, Francesco Visioli, Jean‐Michel Wal, Annette Poeting, Fernando Álvarez, Hermann Broll, Matthew Ramon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-03-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
GMO
DMO
PAT
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746
id doaj-3fe4f0a4c7ab46d1b12be71e0e4d4a14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3fe4f0a4c7ab46d1b12be71e0e4d4a142021-05-02T17:56:21ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-03-01153n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Hanspeter NaegeliAndrew Nicholas BirchJosep CasacubertaAdinda De SchrijverMikołaj Antoni GralakHuw JonesBarbara ManachiniAntoine MesséanElsa Ebbesen NielsenFabien NoguéChristophe RobagliaNils RostoksJeremy SweetChristoph TebbeFrancesco VisioliJean‐Michel WalAnnette PoetingFernando ÁlvarezHermann BrollMatthew RamonAbstract Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbicides. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not identify issues requiring further assessment for food/feed safety. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics tested revealed no relevant differences between cotton MON 88701 and its conventional counterpart. Since complete compositional results were reported for only three sites, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) is not in the position to complete the assessment of the compositional analysis. Moreover, as no 28‐day toxicity study in rodents on the MON 88701 DMO protein was provided, the GMO Panel is not in the position to complete the safety assessment of this protein in cotton MON 88701. Consequently, the GMO Panel cannot complete the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment of food/feed derived from cotton MON 88701. The safety assessment identified no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT protein newly expressed in cotton MON 88701. Considering the routes of exposure and limited exposure levels, the GMO Panel concludes that cotton MON 88701 would not give rise to safety concerns in the event of accidental release of viable seeds into the environment. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton MON 88701. In conclusion, in the absence of an appropriate comparative assessment and an appropriate assessment of the MON 88701 DMO protein, the GMO Panel is not in a position to complete its food/feed risk assessment of cotton MON 88701. The GMO Panel concludes that the cotton MON 88701 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on the environment in the context of the scope of the application.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746GMOcotton (Gossypium hirsutum)MON 88701herbicide toleranceDMOPAT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Andrew Nicholas Birch
Josep Casacuberta
Adinda De Schrijver
Mikołaj Antoni Gralak
Huw Jones
Barbara Manachini
Antoine Messéan
Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen
Fabien Nogué
Christophe Robaglia
Nils Rostoks
Jeremy Sweet
Christoph Tebbe
Francesco Visioli
Jean‐Michel Wal
Annette Poeting
Fernando Álvarez
Hermann Broll
Matthew Ramon
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Andrew Nicholas Birch
Josep Casacuberta
Adinda De Schrijver
Mikołaj Antoni Gralak
Huw Jones
Barbara Manachini
Antoine Messéan
Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen
Fabien Nogué
Christophe Robaglia
Nils Rostoks
Jeremy Sweet
Christoph Tebbe
Francesco Visioli
Jean‐Michel Wal
Annette Poeting
Fernando Álvarez
Hermann Broll
Matthew Ramon
Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
EFSA Journal
GMO
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
MON 88701
herbicide tolerance
DMO
PAT
author_facet EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Andrew Nicholas Birch
Josep Casacuberta
Adinda De Schrijver
Mikołaj Antoni Gralak
Huw Jones
Barbara Manachini
Antoine Messéan
Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen
Fabien Nogué
Christophe Robaglia
Nils Rostoks
Jeremy Sweet
Christoph Tebbe
Francesco Visioli
Jean‐Michel Wal
Annette Poeting
Fernando Álvarez
Hermann Broll
Matthew Ramon
author_sort EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
title Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
title_short Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
title_full Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
title_fullStr Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
title_full_unstemmed Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
title_sort scientific opinion on an application by monsanto (efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton mon 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Abstract Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbicides. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not identify issues requiring further assessment for food/feed safety. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics tested revealed no relevant differences between cotton MON 88701 and its conventional counterpart. Since complete compositional results were reported for only three sites, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) is not in the position to complete the assessment of the compositional analysis. Moreover, as no 28‐day toxicity study in rodents on the MON 88701 DMO protein was provided, the GMO Panel is not in the position to complete the safety assessment of this protein in cotton MON 88701. Consequently, the GMO Panel cannot complete the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment of food/feed derived from cotton MON 88701. The safety assessment identified no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT protein newly expressed in cotton MON 88701. Considering the routes of exposure and limited exposure levels, the GMO Panel concludes that cotton MON 88701 would not give rise to safety concerns in the event of accidental release of viable seeds into the environment. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton MON 88701. In conclusion, in the absence of an appropriate comparative assessment and an appropriate assessment of the MON 88701 DMO protein, the GMO Panel is not in a position to complete its food/feed risk assessment of cotton MON 88701. The GMO Panel concludes that the cotton MON 88701 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on the environment in the context of the scope of the application.
topic GMO
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
MON 88701
herbicide tolerance
DMO
PAT
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsgmo scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT hanspeternaegeli scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT andrewnicholasbirch scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT josepcasacuberta scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT adindadeschrijver scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT mikołajantonigralak scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT huwjones scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT barbaramanachini scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT antoinemessean scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT elsaebbesennielsen scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT fabiennogue scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT christopherobaglia scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT nilsrostoks scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT jeremysweet scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT christophtebbe scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT francescovisioli scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT jeanmichelwal scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT annettepoeting scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT fernandoalvarez scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT hermannbroll scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
AT matthewramon scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003
_version_ 1721489206768828416