Development, Validation, and Implementation of a Medical Judgment Metric

• Main Authors: Rami A. Ahmed DO, MHPE, Michele L. McCarroll PhD, Alan Schwartz PhD, M. David Gothard MS, S. Scott Atkinson, Patrick G. Hughes DO, Jose Ramon Cepeda Brito MD, Lori Assad MPH, Jerry G. Myers PhD, Richard L. George MD, MSPH, FACS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-06-01
• Series: MDM Policy & Practice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317715262

Background: Medical decision making is a critical, yet understudied, aspect of medical education. Aims: To develop the Medical Judgment Metric (MJM), a numerical rubric to quantify good decisions in practice in simulated environments; and to obtain initial preliminary evidence of reliability and validity of the tool. Methods: The individual MJM items, domains, and sections of the MJM were built based on existing standardized frameworks. Content validity was determined by a convenient sample of eight experts. The MJM instrument was pilot tested in four medical simulations with a team of three medical raters assessing 40 participants with four levels of medical experience and skill. Results: Raters were highly consistent in their MJM scores in each scenario (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.965 to 0.987) as well as their evaluation of the expected patient outcome (Fleiss’s Kappa 0.791 to 0.906). For each simulation scenario, average rater cut-scores significantly predicted expected loss of life or stabilization (Cohen’s Kappa 0.851 to 0.880). Discussion : The MJM demonstrated preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.