A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia

Abstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen E. Ryan, Anna L. Wilkinson, Eric Chow, Tim Read, Marcus Chen, Peter Locke, David Leitinger, Catriona Bradshaw, Alisa Pedrana, Margaret Hellard, Christopher K. Fairley, Mark Stoové
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-10-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
MSM
HIV
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903
id doaj-3ff33b66f94147b09a939a77b14161eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ff33b66f94147b09a939a77b14161eb2020-11-25T01:19:48ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052019-10-0143541942310.1111/1753-6405.12903A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, AustraliaKathleen E. Ryan0Anna L. Wilkinson1Eric Chow2Tim Read3Marcus Chen4Peter Locke5David Leitinger6Catriona Bradshaw7Alisa Pedrana8Margaret Hellard9Christopher K. Fairley10Mark Stoové11Public Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPRONTO! Victorian AIDS Council Melbourne VictoriaPRONTO! Victorian AIDS Council Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaAbstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Methods: All GBM attending PRONTO! and MSHC for HIV testing between August 2013 and April 2016 were included. We describe the number of tests, percentage of clients who returned during follow‐up, the mean number of tests and median time between tests at the two services. Results: At PRONTO!, 33% of 3,102 GBM and at MSHC 50% of 9,836 GBM returned for a further HIV test at least once. The mean number of tests per client was 1.7 and 2.5 at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. A majority of clients at both services reported behaviours that would recommend up to quarterly testing, however, the median time between tests was 20.0 and 17.0 weeks at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusions: A greater proportion of clients returned and returned frequently at MSHC compared to PRONTO!, however, at both services HIV testing frequency was suboptimal. Implications for public health: Novel HIV testing services should provide convenient and comprehensive sexual health services.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903MSMHIVHIV testingcommunity basedtest frequency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathleen E. Ryan
Anna L. Wilkinson
Eric Chow
Tim Read
Marcus Chen
Peter Locke
David Leitinger
Catriona Bradshaw
Alisa Pedrana
Margaret Hellard
Christopher K. Fairley
Mark Stoové
spellingShingle Kathleen E. Ryan
Anna L. Wilkinson
Eric Chow
Tim Read
Marcus Chen
Peter Locke
David Leitinger
Catriona Bradshaw
Alisa Pedrana
Margaret Hellard
Christopher K. Fairley
Mark Stoové
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
MSM
HIV
HIV testing
community based
test frequency
author_facet Kathleen E. Ryan
Anna L. Wilkinson
Eric Chow
Tim Read
Marcus Chen
Peter Locke
David Leitinger
Catriona Bradshaw
Alisa Pedrana
Margaret Hellard
Christopher K. Fairley
Mark Stoové
author_sort Kathleen E. Ryan
title A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
title_short A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
title_full A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
title_fullStr A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
title_full_unstemmed A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
title_sort comparative, retrospective analysis of hiv testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in melbourne, australia
publisher Wiley
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Abstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Methods: All GBM attending PRONTO! and MSHC for HIV testing between August 2013 and April 2016 were included. We describe the number of tests, percentage of clients who returned during follow‐up, the mean number of tests and median time between tests at the two services. Results: At PRONTO!, 33% of 3,102 GBM and at MSHC 50% of 9,836 GBM returned for a further HIV test at least once. The mean number of tests per client was 1.7 and 2.5 at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. A majority of clients at both services reported behaviours that would recommend up to quarterly testing, however, the median time between tests was 20.0 and 17.0 weeks at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusions: A greater proportion of clients returned and returned frequently at MSHC compared to PRONTO!, however, at both services HIV testing frequency was suboptimal. Implications for public health: Novel HIV testing services should provide convenient and comprehensive sexual health services.
topic MSM
HIV
HIV testing
community based
test frequency
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleeneryan acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT annalwilkinson acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT ericchow acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT timread acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT marcuschen acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT peterlocke acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT davidleitinger acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT catrionabradshaw acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT alisapedrana acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT margarethellard acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT christopherkfairley acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT markstoove acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT kathleeneryan comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT annalwilkinson comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT ericchow comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT timread comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT marcuschen comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT peterlocke comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT davidleitinger comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT catrionabradshaw comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT alisapedrana comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT margarethellard comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT christopherkfairley comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
AT markstoove comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia
_version_ 1725137259559124992