A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia
Abstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Met...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903 |
id |
doaj-3ff33b66f94147b09a939a77b14161eb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ff33b66f94147b09a939a77b14161eb2020-11-25T01:19:48ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052019-10-0143541942310.1111/1753-6405.12903A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, AustraliaKathleen E. Ryan0Anna L. Wilkinson1Eric Chow2Tim Read3Marcus Chen4Peter Locke5David Leitinger6Catriona Bradshaw7Alisa Pedrana8Margaret Hellard9Christopher K. Fairley10Mark Stoové11Public Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPRONTO! Victorian AIDS Council Melbourne VictoriaPRONTO! Victorian AIDS Council Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Melbourne VictoriaPublic Health Discipline Burnet Institute Melbourne VictoriaAbstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Methods: All GBM attending PRONTO! and MSHC for HIV testing between August 2013 and April 2016 were included. We describe the number of tests, percentage of clients who returned during follow‐up, the mean number of tests and median time between tests at the two services. Results: At PRONTO!, 33% of 3,102 GBM and at MSHC 50% of 9,836 GBM returned for a further HIV test at least once. The mean number of tests per client was 1.7 and 2.5 at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. A majority of clients at both services reported behaviours that would recommend up to quarterly testing, however, the median time between tests was 20.0 and 17.0 weeks at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusions: A greater proportion of clients returned and returned frequently at MSHC compared to PRONTO!, however, at both services HIV testing frequency was suboptimal. Implications for public health: Novel HIV testing services should provide convenient and comprehensive sexual health services.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903MSMHIVHIV testingcommunity basedtest frequency |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathleen E. Ryan Anna L. Wilkinson Eric Chow Tim Read Marcus Chen Peter Locke David Leitinger Catriona Bradshaw Alisa Pedrana Margaret Hellard Christopher K. Fairley Mark Stoové |
spellingShingle |
Kathleen E. Ryan Anna L. Wilkinson Eric Chow Tim Read Marcus Chen Peter Locke David Leitinger Catriona Bradshaw Alisa Pedrana Margaret Hellard Christopher K. Fairley Mark Stoové A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health MSM HIV HIV testing community based test frequency |
author_facet |
Kathleen E. Ryan Anna L. Wilkinson Eric Chow Tim Read Marcus Chen Peter Locke David Leitinger Catriona Bradshaw Alisa Pedrana Margaret Hellard Christopher K. Fairley Mark Stoové |
author_sort |
Kathleen E. Ryan |
title |
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia |
title_short |
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia |
title_full |
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia |
title_fullStr |
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative, retrospective analysis of HIV testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia |
title_sort |
comparative, retrospective analysis of hiv testing among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in melbourne, australia |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
issn |
1326-0200 1753-6405 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective: PRONTO!, a peer‐led rapid HIV‐testing service in Melbourne, Australia, opened to improve HIV testing among gay and bisexual men (GBM). We compared client characteristics and return testing among GBM testing at PRONTO! with GBM testing at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC). Methods: All GBM attending PRONTO! and MSHC for HIV testing between August 2013 and April 2016 were included. We describe the number of tests, percentage of clients who returned during follow‐up, the mean number of tests and median time between tests at the two services. Results: At PRONTO!, 33% of 3,102 GBM and at MSHC 50% of 9,836 GBM returned for a further HIV test at least once. The mean number of tests per client was 1.7 and 2.5 at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. A majority of clients at both services reported behaviours that would recommend up to quarterly testing, however, the median time between tests was 20.0 and 17.0 weeks at PRONTO! and MSHC (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusions: A greater proportion of clients returned and returned frequently at MSHC compared to PRONTO!, however, at both services HIV testing frequency was suboptimal. Implications for public health: Novel HIV testing services should provide convenient and comprehensive sexual health services. |
topic |
MSM HIV HIV testing community based test frequency |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12903 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathleeneryan acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT annalwilkinson acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT ericchow acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT timread acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT marcuschen acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT peterlocke acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT davidleitinger acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT catrionabradshaw acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT alisapedrana acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT margarethellard acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT christopherkfairley acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT markstoove acomparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT kathleeneryan comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT annalwilkinson comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT ericchow comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT timread comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT marcuschen comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT peterlocke comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT davidleitinger comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT catrionabradshaw comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT alisapedrana comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT margarethellard comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT christopherkfairley comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia AT markstoove comparativeretrospectiveanalysisofhivtestingamonggaybisexualandothermenwhohavesexwithmeninmelbourneaustralia |
_version_ |
1725137259559124992 |