Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doyeon Kim, Sukhee Park, Jong Man Kim, Gyu Seong Choi, Gaab Soo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83173-5
id doaj-401f5b1805e0421f87dd3856d28e68cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-401f5b1805e0421f87dd3856d28e68cb2021-02-14T12:30:47ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-011111710.1038/s41598-021-83173-5Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trialDoyeon Kim0Sukhee Park1Jong Man Kim2Gyu Seong Choi3Gaab Soo Kim4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, International St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University School of MedicineDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineAbstract The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy (LLDH). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, intraoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 2 h after the airway devices insertion (PaCO2_2h) was compared as a primary outcome. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group LMA (n = 45, used Protector LMA), or Group ETT (n = 43, used cuffed ETT). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory variables including mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were compared. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary aspiration were recorded. The PaCO2_2h were equally effective between two groups (mean difference: 0.99 mmHg, P = 0.003; 90% confidence limits: − 0.22, 2.19). The intraoperative change in MBP, HR, and PIP were differed over time between two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.015, and P = 0.039, respectively). There were no differences of the incidence of postoperative complications at 24 h following LLDH (sore throat and hoarseness: P > 0.99, PONV: P > 0.99, and P = 0.65, respectively). No case showed pulmonary aspiration in both groups. Compared with endotracheal tube, second-generation LMA is equally efficient during LLDH. The second-generation LMA can be considered as the effective airway devices for securing airway in patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Trial Registration This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr . CRiS No. KCT0003711).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83173-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Doyeon Kim
Sukhee Park
Jong Man Kim
Gyu Seong Choi
Gaab Soo Kim
spellingShingle Doyeon Kim
Sukhee Park
Jong Man Kim
Gyu Seong Choi
Gaab Soo Kim
Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Scientific Reports
author_facet Doyeon Kim
Sukhee Park
Jong Man Kim
Gyu Seong Choi
Gaab Soo Kim
author_sort Doyeon Kim
title Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy (LLDH). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, intraoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 2 h after the airway devices insertion (PaCO2_2h) was compared as a primary outcome. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group LMA (n = 45, used Protector LMA), or Group ETT (n = 43, used cuffed ETT). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory variables including mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were compared. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary aspiration were recorded. The PaCO2_2h were equally effective between two groups (mean difference: 0.99 mmHg, P = 0.003; 90% confidence limits: − 0.22, 2.19). The intraoperative change in MBP, HR, and PIP were differed over time between two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.015, and P = 0.039, respectively). There were no differences of the incidence of postoperative complications at 24 h following LLDH (sore throat and hoarseness: P > 0.99, PONV: P > 0.99, and P = 0.65, respectively). No case showed pulmonary aspiration in both groups. Compared with endotracheal tube, second-generation LMA is equally efficient during LLDH. The second-generation LMA can be considered as the effective airway devices for securing airway in patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Trial Registration This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr . CRiS No. KCT0003711).
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83173-5
work_keys_str_mv AT doyeonkim secondgenerationlaryngealmaskairwayduringlaparoscopiclivingliverdonorhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sukheepark secondgenerationlaryngealmaskairwayduringlaparoscopiclivingliverdonorhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jongmankim secondgenerationlaryngealmaskairwayduringlaparoscopiclivingliverdonorhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gyuseongchoi secondgenerationlaryngealmaskairwayduringlaparoscopiclivingliverdonorhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaabsookim secondgenerationlaryngealmaskairwayduringlaparoscopiclivingliverdonorhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724270381070548992