Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus

A pigmented variant of lichen planus (LP) was first reported from India in 1974 by Bhutani et al. who coined the term LP pigmentosus (LPP) to give a descriptive nomenclature to it. LP has a number of variants, one of which is LPP. This disease has also later been reported from the Middle East, Latin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aparajita Ghosh, Arijit Coondoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2016;volume=61;issue=5;spage=482;epage=486;aulast=Ghosh
id doaj-4044d260d8b94014a282247da2dbe634
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4044d260d8b94014a282247da2dbe6342020-11-24T22:03:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112016-01-0161548248610.4103/0019-5154.190108Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensusAparajita GhoshArijit CoondooA pigmented variant of lichen planus (LP) was first reported from India in 1974 by Bhutani et al. who coined the term LP pigmentosus (LPP) to give a descriptive nomenclature to it. LP has a number of variants, one of which is LPP. This disease has also later been reported from the Middle East, Latin America, Korea, and Japan, especially in people with darker skin. It has an insidious onset. Initially, small, black or brown macules appear on sun-exposed areas. They later merge to form large hyperpigmented patches. The disease principally affects the sun-exposed areas of the body such as the face, trunk, and upper extremities. The oral mucosa may rarely be involved. However, the palms, soles, and nails are not affected. Histologically, the epidermis is atrophic along with vacuolar degeneration of basal cell layer. The dermis exhibits incontinence of pigment with scattered melanophages and a sparse follicular or perivascular infiltrate. There is a considerable similarity in histopathological findings between LPP and erythema dyschromicum perstans. However, there are immunologic and clinical differences between the two. These observations have led to a controversy regarding the identity of the two entities. While some dermatologists consider them to be the same, others have opined that the two should be considered as distinctly different diseases. A number of associations such as hepatitis C virus infection, frontal fibrosing alopecia, acrokeratosis of Bazex and nephrotic syndrome have been reported with LPP. A rare variant, LPP inversus, with similar clinical and histopathological findings was reported in 2001. As opposed to LPP, this variant occurs in covered intertriginous locations such as groins and axillae and mostly affects white-skinned persons.http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2016;volume=61;issue=5;spage=482;epage=486;aulast=GhoshErythema dyschromicum perstanslichen planuslichen planus pigmentosus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aparajita Ghosh
Arijit Coondoo
spellingShingle Aparajita Ghosh
Arijit Coondoo
Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Erythema dyschromicum perstans
lichen planus
lichen planus pigmentosus
author_facet Aparajita Ghosh
Arijit Coondoo
author_sort Aparajita Ghosh
title Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
title_short Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
title_full Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
title_fullStr Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
title_full_unstemmed Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus
title_sort lichen planus pigmentosus: the controversial consensus
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
publishDate 2016-01-01
description A pigmented variant of lichen planus (LP) was first reported from India in 1974 by Bhutani et al. who coined the term LP pigmentosus (LPP) to give a descriptive nomenclature to it. LP has a number of variants, one of which is LPP. This disease has also later been reported from the Middle East, Latin America, Korea, and Japan, especially in people with darker skin. It has an insidious onset. Initially, small, black or brown macules appear on sun-exposed areas. They later merge to form large hyperpigmented patches. The disease principally affects the sun-exposed areas of the body such as the face, trunk, and upper extremities. The oral mucosa may rarely be involved. However, the palms, soles, and nails are not affected. Histologically, the epidermis is atrophic along with vacuolar degeneration of basal cell layer. The dermis exhibits incontinence of pigment with scattered melanophages and a sparse follicular or perivascular infiltrate. There is a considerable similarity in histopathological findings between LPP and erythema dyschromicum perstans. However, there are immunologic and clinical differences between the two. These observations have led to a controversy regarding the identity of the two entities. While some dermatologists consider them to be the same, others have opined that the two should be considered as distinctly different diseases. A number of associations such as hepatitis C virus infection, frontal fibrosing alopecia, acrokeratosis of Bazex and nephrotic syndrome have been reported with LPP. A rare variant, LPP inversus, with similar clinical and histopathological findings was reported in 2001. As opposed to LPP, this variant occurs in covered intertriginous locations such as groins and axillae and mostly affects white-skinned persons.
topic Erythema dyschromicum perstans
lichen planus
lichen planus pigmentosus
url http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2016;volume=61;issue=5;spage=482;epage=486;aulast=Ghosh
work_keys_str_mv AT aparajitaghosh lichenplanuspigmentosusthecontroversialconsensus
AT arijitcoondoo lichenplanuspigmentosusthecontroversialconsensus
_version_ 1725831538321391616