Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle

Actually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Élise Geisler, Théa Manola
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille 2011-07-01
Series:Projets de Paysage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868
id doaj-40610abacd754cbabca65a48c49a4c57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40610abacd754cbabca65a48c49a4c572021-07-08T16:37:30ZfraAgrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP LilleProjets de Paysage1969-61242011-07-01610.4000/paysage.17868Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielleÉlise GeislerThéa ManolaActually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields of the research and the founding works on the mono-sensory landscapes concerning the other senses that the sight. This article presents the first results of a crossed analysis, in terms of methodological contributions, of three research works : a research led within the framework of the Pirve financed by the Puca and CNRS, and phd researches of E. Geisler and of T. Manola. These three researches adopt a sensitive approach of the landscape with similar methods (interviews, commented courses, sound journal/multisensory bag). For the precise case of the sustainable neighborhood of Kronsberg in Hanover, we are going to try to present the state of progress of our works concerning the methodological part and to determine the contributions and the complementarities of the various methods, as well as the difficulties met for each of them. We shall also compare both, almost identical protocols (applied on one hand to the sound and on the other hand to the multisensory) and shall try to see the advantages of the one and the other one.http://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868daily landscapesustainable neighborhoodsoundscapemultisensory landscapeinhabitants perceptions
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Élise Geisler
Théa Manola
spellingShingle Élise Geisler
Théa Manola
Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
Projets de Paysage
daily landscape
sustainable neighborhood
soundscape
multisensory landscape
inhabitants perceptions
author_facet Élise Geisler
Théa Manola
author_sort Élise Geisler
title Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
title_short Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
title_full Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
title_fullStr Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
title_full_unstemmed Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
title_sort les paysages de kronsberg à hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
publisher Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
series Projets de Paysage
issn 1969-6124
publishDate 2011-07-01
description Actually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields of the research and the founding works on the mono-sensory landscapes concerning the other senses that the sight. This article presents the first results of a crossed analysis, in terms of methodological contributions, of three research works : a research led within the framework of the Pirve financed by the Puca and CNRS, and phd researches of E. Geisler and of T. Manola. These three researches adopt a sensitive approach of the landscape with similar methods (interviews, commented courses, sound journal/multisensory bag). For the precise case of the sustainable neighborhood of Kronsberg in Hanover, we are going to try to present the state of progress of our works concerning the methodological part and to determine the contributions and the complementarities of the various methods, as well as the difficulties met for each of them. We shall also compare both, almost identical protocols (applied on one hand to the sound and on the other hand to the multisensory) and shall try to see the advantages of the one and the other one.
topic daily landscape
sustainable neighborhood
soundscape
multisensory landscape
inhabitants perceptions
url http://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868
work_keys_str_mv AT elisegeisler lespaysagesdekronsbergahanovreapprochessonoreetmultisensorielle
AT theamanola lespaysagesdekronsbergahanovreapprochessonoreetmultisensorielle
_version_ 1721313088342327296