‘What has become of the New Art History?’

The first task of this paper is to mediate and review the topics discussed during the conference ’After the “New Art History”’ (Birmingham, March 2012). In addition, this report offers a historising perspective on the phenomenon of the New Art History since the 1970s, focusing particularly on its pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Kristina Jõekalda
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2013-12-01
Series:	Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:	New Art History feminism social history of art historiography of art history
Online Access:	http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/jc3b5ekalda.pdf

id	doaj-40931859f0e04ea597c5b2165d7b43b7
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-40931859f0e04ea597c5b2165d7b43b72020-11-24T23:05:02ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522013-12-0199KrJ1‘What has become of the New Art History?’ Kristina JõekaldaThe first task of this paper is to mediate and review the topics discussed during the conference ’After the “New Art History”’ (Birmingham, March 2012). In addition, this report offers a historising perspective on the phenomenon of the New Art History since the 1970s, focusing particularly on its present appearances – its diverse manifestations in different regions and contexts. Setting this as the background, visions of the current status, recent history and future perspectives of art history as a whole are touched upon. The review was originally published in the Estonian art magazine KUNST.EE, therefore Estonian art history (since the 1990s) deserves a brief case study.http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/jc3b5ekalda.pdfNew Art Historyfeminismsocial history of arthistoriography of art history
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Kristina Jõekalda
spellingShingle	Kristina Jõekalda ‘What has become of the New Art History?’ Journal of Art Historiography New Art History feminism social history of art historiography of art history
author_facet	Kristina Jõekalda
author_sort	Kristina Jõekalda
title	‘What has become of the New Art History?’
title_short	‘What has become of the New Art History?’
title_full	‘What has become of the New Art History?’
title_fullStr	‘What has become of the New Art History?’
title_full_unstemmed	‘What has become of the New Art History?’
title_sort	‘what has become of the new art history?’
publisher	Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
series	Journal of Art Historiography
issn	2042-4752
publishDate	2013-12-01
description	The first task of this paper is to mediate and review the topics discussed during the conference ’After the “New Art History”’ (Birmingham, March 2012). In addition, this report offers a historising perspective on the phenomenon of the New Art History since the 1970s, focusing particularly on its present appearances – its diverse manifestations in different regions and contexts. Setting this as the background, visions of the current status, recent history and future perspectives of art history as a whole are touched upon. The review was originally published in the Estonian art magazine KUNST.EE, therefore Estonian art history (since the 1990s) deserves a brief case study.
topic	New Art History feminism social history of art historiography of art history
url	http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/jc3b5ekalda.pdf
work_keys_str_mv	AT kristinajoekalda whathasbecomeofthenewarthistory
_version_	1725627936926597120

‘What has become of the New Art History?’

Similar Items