‘What has become of the New Art History?’
The first task of this paper is to mediate and review the topics discussed during the conference ’After the “New Art History”’ (Birmingham, March 2012). In addition, this report offers a historising perspective on the phenomenon of the New Art History since the 1970s, focusing particularly on its pr...
Main Author: | Kristina Jõekalda |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/jc3b5ekalda.pdf |
Similar Items
-
CIHA as the Subject of Art Theory. The Methodological Discourse in the International Congresses of Art History from Post-War Years to the 2000s
by: Cooke, Jennifer
Published: (2018-09-01) -
"Our project is not to add to art history as we know it, but to change it.” The establishment of the Association of Art Historians and the emergence of feminist interventions, 1974-1990
by: Victoria Horne
Published: (2018-06-01) -
‘From minor to major: the minor arts in medieval art history’: From Minor to Major: The Minor Arts in Medieval Art History, edited by Colum Hourihane, Princeton: Index of Christian Art, 2012
by: Elizabeth L’Estrange
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Writing the history of Australian art: its past, present and possible future
by: Terry Smith
Published: (2011-06-01) -
The influence of the Vienna School of Art History on Soviet and post-Soviet historiography: Bruegel’s case
by: Stefaniia Demchuk
Published: (2020-12-01)