The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity
Abstract The project of identifying the cognitive mechanisms or information-processing functions that cause people to categorize others by their race is one of the longest-standing and socially-impactful scientific issues in all of the behavioral sciences. This paper addresses a critical issue with...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82975-x |
id |
doaj-40938b838fba43ba8ad42677c0beb080 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-40938b838fba43ba8ad42677c0beb0802021-02-14T12:33:54ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-82975-xThe correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacityDavid Pietraszewski0Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentAbstract The project of identifying the cognitive mechanisms or information-processing functions that cause people to categorize others by their race is one of the longest-standing and socially-impactful scientific issues in all of the behavioral sciences. This paper addresses a critical issue with one of the few hypotheses in this area that has thus far been successful—the alliance hypothesis of race—which had predicted a set of experimental circumstances that appeared to selectively target and modify people’s implicit categorization of others by their race. Here, we will show why the evidence put forward in favor of this hypothesis was not in fact evidence in support of the hypothesis, contrary to common understanding. We will then provide the necessary and crucial tests of the hypothesis in the context of conflictual alliances, determining if the predictions of the alliance hypothesis of racial categorization in fact hold up to experimental scrutiny. When adequately tested, we find that indeed categorization by race is selectively reduced when crossed with membership in antagonistic alliances—the very pattern predicted by the alliance hypothesis. This finding provides direct experimental evidence that the human mind treats race as proxy for alliance membership, implying that racial categorization does not reflect attention to physical features per se, but rather to social relationships.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82975-x |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David Pietraszewski |
spellingShingle |
David Pietraszewski The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
David Pietraszewski |
author_sort |
David Pietraszewski |
title |
The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
title_short |
The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
title_full |
The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
title_fullStr |
The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
title_sort |
correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Abstract The project of identifying the cognitive mechanisms or information-processing functions that cause people to categorize others by their race is one of the longest-standing and socially-impactful scientific issues in all of the behavioral sciences. This paper addresses a critical issue with one of the few hypotheses in this area that has thus far been successful—the alliance hypothesis of race—which had predicted a set of experimental circumstances that appeared to selectively target and modify people’s implicit categorization of others by their race. Here, we will show why the evidence put forward in favor of this hypothesis was not in fact evidence in support of the hypothesis, contrary to common understanding. We will then provide the necessary and crucial tests of the hypothesis in the context of conflictual alliances, determining if the predictions of the alliance hypothesis of racial categorization in fact hold up to experimental scrutiny. When adequately tested, we find that indeed categorization by race is selectively reduced when crossed with membership in antagonistic alliances—the very pattern predicted by the alliance hypothesis. This finding provides direct experimental evidence that the human mind treats race as proxy for alliance membership, implying that racial categorization does not reflect attention to physical features per se, but rather to social relationships. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82975-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidpietraszewski thecorrectwaytotestthehypothesisthatracialcategorizationisabyproductofanevolvedalliancetrackingcapacity AT davidpietraszewski correctwaytotestthehypothesisthatracialcategorizationisabyproductofanevolvedalliancetrackingcapacity |
_version_ |
1724270270308417536 |