Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot
Fan Huang,1,* Mingwang Qiu,2,* Siyi Zhao,1,* Lin Dai,2 Yanpeng Xu,2 Yunying Yang,2 Liming Lu,2 Rusong Guo,1,3 Qiang Tian,1,3 Zhiyong Fan,1,3 Shan Wu1,3 1The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China...
Main Authors: | Huang F, Qiu M, Zhao S, Dai L, Xu Y, Yang Y, Lu L, Guo R, Tian Q, Fan Z, Wu S |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pain Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-the-characteristics-reporting-and-methodological-quality-of-peer-reviewed-article-JPR |
Similar Items
-
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions
by: Francisco Gómez-García, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
by: Svjetlana Dosenovic, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
by: Patrick Sequeira-Byron, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01) -
How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
by: Dawid Pieper, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps
by: Neal R. Haddaway, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)