Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives

Bladder cancer (BC) remains one of the most common cancer worldwide. Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with urinary diversion (UD) is still considered the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and for recurrent non-muscle invas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riccardo, Giuseppe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian Medical Press Ltd.(H.K.) 2019-12-01
Series:Annals of Urologic Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://auo.asmepress.com/articles/auo_2019017.html
id doaj-40bfd7527ea04221962de5d567d84ad4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40bfd7527ea04221962de5d567d84ad42020-11-25T01:45:55ZengAsian Medical Press Ltd.(H.K.)Annals of Urologic Oncology2617-77652617-77732019-12-01221710.32948/auo.2019.12.15Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectivesRiccardo 0Giuseppe 1MastroianniSimoneBladder cancer (BC) remains one of the most common cancer worldwide. Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with urinary diversion (UD) is still considered the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and for recurrent non-muscle invasive disease. The open approach remains the reference option of treatment for RC, even if robotic surgery is rapidly increasing. Nowadays, several studies have reported perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), but data are still immature to compare both procedures. All the current randomized controlled trials (RCTs), did not prove any significant difference between open RC and RARC, underlining no superiority between both procedures. Therefore, RARC is still considered an investigational procedure. On the other hand, modern robotic surgical practice has been evolved by the introduction of innovative technologies. The technological progress is improving, in particular in robotic surgery, offering several future perspectives, such as the ICG technique. The aim of the review is to describe the state of art, and to outline future perspectives of RARC, in order to establish the role of robotic surgery in the complex field of radical cystectomy.http://auo.asmepress.com/articles/auo_2019017.htmlbladder cancerradical cystectomyrobot-assisted radical cystectomyurinary diversion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riccardo
Giuseppe
spellingShingle Riccardo
Giuseppe
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
Annals of Urologic Oncology
bladder cancer
radical cystectomy
robot-assisted radical cystectomy
urinary diversion
author_facet Riccardo
Giuseppe
author_sort Riccardo
title Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
title_short Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
title_full Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
title_fullStr Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
title_sort robot-assisted radical cystectomy: state of art and future perspectives
publisher Asian Medical Press Ltd.(H.K.)
series Annals of Urologic Oncology
issn 2617-7765
2617-7773
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Bladder cancer (BC) remains one of the most common cancer worldwide. Radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with urinary diversion (UD) is still considered the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and for recurrent non-muscle invasive disease. The open approach remains the reference option of treatment for RC, even if robotic surgery is rapidly increasing. Nowadays, several studies have reported perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), but data are still immature to compare both procedures. All the current randomized controlled trials (RCTs), did not prove any significant difference between open RC and RARC, underlining no superiority between both procedures. Therefore, RARC is still considered an investigational procedure. On the other hand, modern robotic surgical practice has been evolved by the introduction of innovative technologies. The technological progress is improving, in particular in robotic surgery, offering several future perspectives, such as the ICG technique. The aim of the review is to describe the state of art, and to outline future perspectives of RARC, in order to establish the role of robotic surgery in the complex field of radical cystectomy.
topic bladder cancer
radical cystectomy
robot-assisted radical cystectomy
urinary diversion
url http://auo.asmepress.com/articles/auo_2019017.html
work_keys_str_mv AT riccardo robotassistedradicalcystectomystateofartandfutureperspectives
AT giuseppe robotassistedradicalcystectomystateofartandfutureperspectives
_version_ 1725021874223579136