Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report

Abstract Objectives In the last two decades, several organizational initiatives have moved Geisinger into closer alignment with the key characteristics of the learning health system (LHS) model. The intent of this experience report is to provide a firsthand view of the potential of the model and of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Daniel Davis, Marc S. Williams, Rebecca A. Stametz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Learning Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10221
id doaj-40d11927bbbe43948ac1a0afdb643bcc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40d11927bbbe43948ac1a0afdb643bcc2021-05-03T04:53:38ZengWileyLearning Health Systems2379-61462021-04-0152n/an/a10.1002/lrh2.10221Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress reportF. Daniel Davis0Marc S. Williams1Rebecca A. Stametz2Center for Translational Bioethics and Healthcare Policy Danville Pennsylvania USAGenomic Medicine Institute Danville Pennsylvania USASteele Institute for Health Innovation Danville Pennsylvania USAAbstract Objectives In the last two decades, several organizational initiatives have moved Geisinger into closer alignment with the key characteristics of the learning health system (LHS) model. The intent of this experience report is to provide a firsthand view of the potential of the model and of the complex, multifaceted nature of any endeavor designed and implemented to realize that potential. Methods After describing Geisinger, we offer a critical self‐assessment of our progress toward the goal of becoming an LHS, followed by an account of the challenges. Results Geisinger has made incremental but measurable progress in implementing the LHS model, especially in two key domains: in patient‐clinician engagement and science and informatics. Other challenges, however, present significant opportunities for additional forward movement, especially with respect to incentives, culture, and leadership. Conclusion Becoming a fully realized LHS is and will be a long‐term challenge for any organization that embraces this aspiration.https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10221learning health systemorganizational culturepatient engagement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Daniel Davis
Marc S. Williams
Rebecca A. Stametz
spellingShingle F. Daniel Davis
Marc S. Williams
Rebecca A. Stametz
Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
Learning Health Systems
learning health system
organizational culture
patient engagement
author_facet F. Daniel Davis
Marc S. Williams
Rebecca A. Stametz
author_sort F. Daniel Davis
title Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
title_short Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
title_full Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
title_fullStr Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
title_full_unstemmed Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report
title_sort geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: a progress report
publisher Wiley
series Learning Health Systems
issn 2379-6146
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Objectives In the last two decades, several organizational initiatives have moved Geisinger into closer alignment with the key characteristics of the learning health system (LHS) model. The intent of this experience report is to provide a firsthand view of the potential of the model and of the complex, multifaceted nature of any endeavor designed and implemented to realize that potential. Methods After describing Geisinger, we offer a critical self‐assessment of our progress toward the goal of becoming an LHS, followed by an account of the challenges. Results Geisinger has made incremental but measurable progress in implementing the LHS model, especially in two key domains: in patient‐clinician engagement and science and informatics. Other challenges, however, present significant opportunities for additional forward movement, especially with respect to incentives, culture, and leadership. Conclusion Becoming a fully realized LHS is and will be a long‐term challenge for any organization that embraces this aspiration.
topic learning health system
organizational culture
patient engagement
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10221
work_keys_str_mv AT fdanieldavis geisingersefforttorealizeitspotentialasalearninghealthsystemaprogressreport
AT marcswilliams geisingersefforttorealizeitspotentialasalearninghealthsystemaprogressreport
AT rebeccaastametz geisingersefforttorealizeitspotentialasalearninghealthsystemaprogressreport
_version_ 1721483520430309376