The Effects on Re‐offending of Custodial vs. Non‐custodial Sanctions: An Updated Systematic Review of the State of Knowledge
This Campbell systematic review compares effects of custodial and non‐custodial sentences on re‐offending. The authors found 14 high‐quality studies, including three randomised controlled trials and two natural experiments. Imprisonment is no more effective than community‐based sanctions in reducing...
Main Authors: | Patrice Villettaz, Gwladys Gillieron, Martin Killias |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015.1 |
Similar Items
-
PROTOCOL: Effects of custodial vs. non‐custodial sentences on re‐offending
by: Patrice Villettaz, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01) -
Young offenders and the transition from custody to community
by: Meek, Rosie
Published: (2007) -
UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-Custodial Sanctions for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules): A Gendered Critique
by: Rosemary Barberet, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Conditional sentencing and the need for a principled system of non-custodial sanctions
by: Ikonomov, Daniel Ivanov
Published: (2007) -
Conditional sentencing and the need for a principled system of non-custodial sanctions
by: Ikonomov, Daniel Ivanov
Published: (2007)