Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea

Context: Mādhava is regarded as a 7th century Indian Physician who composed two treatises (in Sanskrit) on Ayurveda, the Mādhava Nidāna and Mādhava Cikitsā. The former treatise deals with the diagnosis of diseases while the latter with the treatment using medicinal plants and other recipes. In Mādha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niteen Ramdas Salve, Debendranath Mishra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Ancient Science of Life
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ancientscienceoflife.org/article.asp?issn=0257-7941;year=2016;volume=35;issue=4;spage=195;epage=200;aulast=Salve
id doaj-4187284f3921442abd328498fb67c3f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4187284f3921442abd328498fb67c3f12020-11-24T21:33:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAncient Science of Life0257-79412016-01-0135419520010.4103/0257-7941.188179Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoeaNiteen Ramdas SalveDebendranath MishraContext: Mādhava is regarded as a 7th century Indian Physician who composed two treatises (in Sanskrit) on Ayurveda, the Mādhava Nidāna and Mādhava Cikitsā. The former treatise deals with the diagnosis of diseases while the latter with the treatment using medicinal plants and other recipes. In Mādhava Cikitsā , a common Sanskrit name is found to describe two or more totally different botanical plant species (thus leading to ambiguity) and a distinct botanical species is also found to represent two or more Sanskrit names at several instances. Aims: The present paper deals with the correct botanical identification (most probable) of Sanskrit named plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of Diarrhoea (Atisāra Cikitsā). Subjects and Methods: The authentic manuscripts of 'Mādhava Cikitsā' were critically studied for the present research outcome. A detailed literature survey is carried out from various references and texts. Results: The list of Sanskrit named plants contains 103 names, while after the critical study and assigning the most probable botanical identification as per ICBN, the list of plant species described in the text for the treatment of Diarrhoea is found to contain 73 names. Conclusions: The present study will certainly benefit Ayurvedic medical practitioners and pharmaceutical companies in selection of proper plant species avoiding substitutions for drug formulation.http://www.ancientscienceoflife.org/article.asp?issn=0257-7941;year=2016;volume=35;issue=4;spage=195;epage=200;aulast=SalveAtisāra Cikitsābotanical identificationdiarrhoeaMādhava Cikitsā
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niteen Ramdas Salve
Debendranath Mishra
spellingShingle Niteen Ramdas Salve
Debendranath Mishra
Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
Ancient Science of Life
Atisāra Cikitsā
botanical identification
diarrhoea
Mādhava Cikitsā
author_facet Niteen Ramdas Salve
Debendranath Mishra
author_sort Niteen Ramdas Salve
title Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
title_short Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
title_full Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
title_fullStr Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
title_full_unstemmed Botanical identification of plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
title_sort botanical identification of plants described in mādhava cikitsā for the treatment of diarrhoea
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Ancient Science of Life
issn 0257-7941
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Context: Mādhava is regarded as a 7th century Indian Physician who composed two treatises (in Sanskrit) on Ayurveda, the Mādhava Nidāna and Mādhava Cikitsā. The former treatise deals with the diagnosis of diseases while the latter with the treatment using medicinal plants and other recipes. In Mādhava Cikitsā , a common Sanskrit name is found to describe two or more totally different botanical plant species (thus leading to ambiguity) and a distinct botanical species is also found to represent two or more Sanskrit names at several instances. Aims: The present paper deals with the correct botanical identification (most probable) of Sanskrit named plants described in Mādhava Cikitsā for the treatment of Diarrhoea (Atisāra Cikitsā). Subjects and Methods: The authentic manuscripts of 'Mādhava Cikitsā' were critically studied for the present research outcome. A detailed literature survey is carried out from various references and texts. Results: The list of Sanskrit named plants contains 103 names, while after the critical study and assigning the most probable botanical identification as per ICBN, the list of plant species described in the text for the treatment of Diarrhoea is found to contain 73 names. Conclusions: The present study will certainly benefit Ayurvedic medical practitioners and pharmaceutical companies in selection of proper plant species avoiding substitutions for drug formulation.
topic Atisāra Cikitsā
botanical identification
diarrhoea
Mādhava Cikitsā
url http://www.ancientscienceoflife.org/article.asp?issn=0257-7941;year=2016;volume=35;issue=4;spage=195;epage=200;aulast=Salve
work_keys_str_mv AT niteenramdassalve botanicalidentificationofplantsdescribedinmadhavacikitsaforthetreatmentofdiarrhoea
AT debendranathmishra botanicalidentificationofplantsdescribedinmadhavacikitsaforthetreatmentofdiarrhoea
_version_ 1725954971692695552