Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?

Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Kluft, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, Jaap H. van Dieën, Mirjam Pijnappels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419/full
id doaj-41c00972ac144f0bb4d5d245c7974079
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41c00972ac144f0bb4d5d245c79740792020-11-25T01:32:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2018-10-01910.3389/fphys.2018.01419405970Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?Nick KluftSjoerd M. BruijnJaap H. van DieënMirjam PijnappelsSelecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies when confronted with daily-life motor tasks, which could lead to balance loss or falls. We investigated whether older adults select motor strategies in accordance with their actual physical ability. Twenty-one older adults were subjected to a stepping down paradigm, in which full-body kinematics of selected and reactive behavior were recorded. Stepping down from a curb can be done with either (1) a relatively low effort but more balance threatening heel landing, or (2) a more controlled but more demanding toe landing. The probability of selecting a toe landing grows with an increase in curb height. We determined the curb height at which participants switched from heel to toe landing during expected stepping down over different heights as an indicator of their perceived ability. During an unexpected step down trial, participants encountered a step down of 0.1 m earlier than expected, because part of the walkway was removed and covered by a black cloth. We evaluated participants' actual physical ability from the reactive behavior, with performance defined as the reduction in kinetic energy between the peak value after landing and the onset of the next step. To unravel whether the selected motor strategies corresponded with actual physical ability, the ability to recover from the unexpected step down was correlated to the height at which the participants switched movement strategy. The switching height was not correlated to the ability to recover from an unexpected step down (ρ = 0.034, p = 0.877). This finding suggests that older adults do not select their movement strategy in stepping down based on their actual abilities, or have an imprecise perception of their actual abilities. Future research should evaluate whether inappropriate motor strategy selection in a stepping down paradigm can explain accidental falls in older adults.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419/fullstep descentold agedegree of misjudgmentdecision makingself-perceptionfalls
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nick Kluft
Sjoerd M. Bruijn
Jaap H. van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
spellingShingle Nick Kluft
Sjoerd M. Bruijn
Jaap H. van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
Frontiers in Physiology
step descent
old age
degree of misjudgment
decision making
self-perception
falls
author_facet Nick Kluft
Sjoerd M. Bruijn
Jaap H. van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
author_sort Nick Kluft
title Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_short Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_full Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_fullStr Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_full_unstemmed Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_sort do older adults select appropriate motor strategies in a stepping-down paradigm?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies when confronted with daily-life motor tasks, which could lead to balance loss or falls. We investigated whether older adults select motor strategies in accordance with their actual physical ability. Twenty-one older adults were subjected to a stepping down paradigm, in which full-body kinematics of selected and reactive behavior were recorded. Stepping down from a curb can be done with either (1) a relatively low effort but more balance threatening heel landing, or (2) a more controlled but more demanding toe landing. The probability of selecting a toe landing grows with an increase in curb height. We determined the curb height at which participants switched from heel to toe landing during expected stepping down over different heights as an indicator of their perceived ability. During an unexpected step down trial, participants encountered a step down of 0.1 m earlier than expected, because part of the walkway was removed and covered by a black cloth. We evaluated participants' actual physical ability from the reactive behavior, with performance defined as the reduction in kinetic energy between the peak value after landing and the onset of the next step. To unravel whether the selected motor strategies corresponded with actual physical ability, the ability to recover from the unexpected step down was correlated to the height at which the participants switched movement strategy. The switching height was not correlated to the ability to recover from an unexpected step down (ρ = 0.034, p = 0.877). This finding suggests that older adults do not select their movement strategy in stepping down based on their actual abilities, or have an imprecise perception of their actual abilities. Future research should evaluate whether inappropriate motor strategy selection in a stepping down paradigm can explain accidental falls in older adults.
topic step descent
old age
degree of misjudgment
decision making
self-perception
falls
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nickkluft doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT sjoerdmbruijn doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT jaaphvandieen doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT mirjampijnappels doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
_version_ 1725080076071993344