How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial

Context: The absence of a protocol for the treatment of halitosis has led us to compare mouthrinses with mechanical oral hygiene procedures for treating morning breath by employing a hand-held sulfide monitor. Aims: To compare the efficacy of five modalities of treatment for controlling morning hali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto, Sandra Sato, Vinicius Pedrazzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2013;volume=17;issue=6;spage=757;epage=761;aulast=Oliveira-Neto
id doaj-41f5be63a0cb4fbba0baff06f006f12d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41f5be63a0cb4fbba0baff06f006f12d2020-11-25T00:50:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X2013-01-0117675776110.4103/0972-124X.124497How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trialJeronimo M Oliveira-NetoSandra SatoVinicius PedrazziContext: The absence of a protocol for the treatment of halitosis has led us to compare mouthrinses with mechanical oral hygiene procedures for treating morning breath by employing a hand-held sulfide monitor. Aims: To compare the efficacy of five modalities of treatment for controlling morning halitosis in subjects with no dental or periodontal disease. Settings and Design: This is a five-period, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Materials and Methods: Twenty volunteers were randomly assigned to the trial. Testing involved the use of a conventional tongue scraper, a tongue scraper joined to the back of a toothbrush′s head, two mouthrinses (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate) and a soft-bristled toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste for practicing oral hygiene. Statistical Analysis Used: Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 17 for Windows and NCSS 2007 software (P < 0.05). The products and the periods were compared with each other using the Friedman′s test. When significant differences (P < 0.05) were determined, the products and periods were compared in pairs by using the Wilcoxon′s test and by adjusting the original significance level (0.05) for multiple comparisons by using the Bonferroni′s method. Results: The toothbrush′s tongue scraper was able to significantly reduce bad breath for up to 2 h. Chlorhexidine reduced bad breath only at the end of the second hour, an effect that lasted for 3 h. Conclusions: Mechanical tongue cleaning was able to immediately reduce bad breath for a short period, whereas chlorhexidine and mechanical oral hygiene reduced bad breath for longer periods, achieving the best results against morning breath.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2013;volume=17;issue=6;spage=757;epage=761;aulast=Oliveira-NetoHalitosismouthwashestongue scrapersulfide monitor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto
Sandra Sato
Vinicius Pedrazzi
spellingShingle Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto
Sandra Sato
Vinicius Pedrazzi
How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Halitosis
mouthwashes
tongue scraper
sulfide monitor
author_facet Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto
Sandra Sato
Vinicius Pedrazzi
author_sort Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto
title How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
title_short How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
title_full How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
title_fullStr How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed How to deal with morning bad breath: A randomized, crossover clinical trial
title_sort how to deal with morning bad breath: a randomized, crossover clinical trial
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
issn 0972-124X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Context: The absence of a protocol for the treatment of halitosis has led us to compare mouthrinses with mechanical oral hygiene procedures for treating morning breath by employing a hand-held sulfide monitor. Aims: To compare the efficacy of five modalities of treatment for controlling morning halitosis in subjects with no dental or periodontal disease. Settings and Design: This is a five-period, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Materials and Methods: Twenty volunteers were randomly assigned to the trial. Testing involved the use of a conventional tongue scraper, a tongue scraper joined to the back of a toothbrush′s head, two mouthrinses (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate) and a soft-bristled toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste for practicing oral hygiene. Statistical Analysis Used: Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 17 for Windows and NCSS 2007 software (P < 0.05). The products and the periods were compared with each other using the Friedman′s test. When significant differences (P < 0.05) were determined, the products and periods were compared in pairs by using the Wilcoxon′s test and by adjusting the original significance level (0.05) for multiple comparisons by using the Bonferroni′s method. Results: The toothbrush′s tongue scraper was able to significantly reduce bad breath for up to 2 h. Chlorhexidine reduced bad breath only at the end of the second hour, an effect that lasted for 3 h. Conclusions: Mechanical tongue cleaning was able to immediately reduce bad breath for a short period, whereas chlorhexidine and mechanical oral hygiene reduced bad breath for longer periods, achieving the best results against morning breath.
topic Halitosis
mouthwashes
tongue scraper
sulfide monitor
url http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2013;volume=17;issue=6;spage=757;epage=761;aulast=Oliveira-Neto
work_keys_str_mv AT jeronimomoliveiraneto howtodealwithmorningbadbreatharandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT sandrasato howtodealwithmorningbadbreatharandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT viniciuspedrazzi howtodealwithmorningbadbreatharandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
_version_ 1725249738163355648