Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease

In the past three decades, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease clinical trials. This review considers the measuring tools that have been developed, suitability of data reporting, complexity of outcome interpretation, and clinical application t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo Martinez-Martin, Mónica M. Kurtis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-03-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285611431974
id doaj-420dfe38fa4543dbb6e23453ad607f11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-420dfe38fa4543dbb6e23453ad607f112020-11-25T02:52:29ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders1756-28561756-28642012-03-01510.1177/1756285611431974Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s diseasePablo Martinez-MartinMónica M. KurtisIn the past three decades, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease clinical trials. This review considers the measuring tools that have been developed, suitability of data reporting, complexity of outcome interpretation, and clinical application to provide evidence regarding available therapeutic interventions to date. In the introduction, different terms regarding quality of life are clearly defined. The methodology section offers an overview of generic, disease specific, and recommended HRQoL scales in Parkinson’s disease and the most important psychometric attributes a scale should meet. The interpretation of HRQoL outcomes is complex and not intuitive. Thus, appropriate reporting of data is crucial in order to calculate relative change, a result that facilitates understanding to what extent an intervention is beneficial. The concept of minimally important change/difference is explained as well as the different approaches to its calculation (anchor-based and distribution-based methods). In the results section, a brief overview of the impact on HRQoL of currently available treatments in Parkinson’s disease is provided. Special emphasis is given to data assessment, highlighting reports that helped understanding of the clinical significance of the intervention and therefore aided in making therapeutic decisions. The discussion section emphasizes the need for more clinical trials with HRQoL as a primary outcome and standardized reporting in order to further our understanding of the complexity of treatment effects and make evidence-based clinical decisions regarding HRQoL in patients with Parkinson’s disease.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285611431974
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pablo Martinez-Martin
Mónica M. Kurtis
spellingShingle Pablo Martinez-Martin
Mónica M. Kurtis
Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
author_facet Pablo Martinez-Martin
Mónica M. Kurtis
author_sort Pablo Martinez-Martin
title Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in parkinson’s disease
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
issn 1756-2856
1756-2864
publishDate 2012-03-01
description In the past three decades, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an outcome variable in Parkinson’s disease clinical trials. This review considers the measuring tools that have been developed, suitability of data reporting, complexity of outcome interpretation, and clinical application to provide evidence regarding available therapeutic interventions to date. In the introduction, different terms regarding quality of life are clearly defined. The methodology section offers an overview of generic, disease specific, and recommended HRQoL scales in Parkinson’s disease and the most important psychometric attributes a scale should meet. The interpretation of HRQoL outcomes is complex and not intuitive. Thus, appropriate reporting of data is crucial in order to calculate relative change, a result that facilitates understanding to what extent an intervention is beneficial. The concept of minimally important change/difference is explained as well as the different approaches to its calculation (anchor-based and distribution-based methods). In the results section, a brief overview of the impact on HRQoL of currently available treatments in Parkinson’s disease is provided. Special emphasis is given to data assessment, highlighting reports that helped understanding of the clinical significance of the intervention and therefore aided in making therapeutic decisions. The discussion section emphasizes the need for more clinical trials with HRQoL as a primary outcome and standardized reporting in order to further our understanding of the complexity of treatment effects and make evidence-based clinical decisions regarding HRQoL in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285611431974
work_keys_str_mv AT pablomartinezmartin healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanoutcomevariableinparkinsonsdisease
AT monicamkurtis healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanoutcomevariableinparkinsonsdisease
_version_ 1724729614698283008