Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Abstract Background & Aims Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms. Although some have a relatively benign and indolent natural history, others can be aggressive and ultimately fatal. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) improve both quality of life and survi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheila D. Rustgi, Aaron Oh, Jeong Yun Yang, Dasol Kang, Edward Wolin, Chung Y. Kong, Chin Hur, Michelle K. Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08306-5
id doaj-4221a750cab84bb4b137da0bbd395a5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4221a750cab84bb4b137da0bbd395a5b2021-05-30T11:49:18ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072021-05-012111810.1186/s12885-021-08306-5Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysisSheila D. Rustgi0Aaron Oh1Jeong Yun Yang2Dasol Kang3Edward Wolin4Chung Y. Kong5Chin Hur6Michelle K. Kim7Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiColumbia University Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical CenterIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical CenterDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiColumbia University Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical CenterHenry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiAbstract Background & Aims Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms. Although some have a relatively benign and indolent natural history, others can be aggressive and ultimately fatal. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) improve both quality of life and survival for these patients once they develop metastatic disease. However, these drugs are costly and their cost-effectiveness is not known. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed and analyzed to compare two treatment strategies for patients with Stage IV GEP-NETs. The first strategy had all patients start SSA immediately while the second strategy waited, reserving SSA initiation until the patient showed signs of progression. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore model parameter uncertainty. Results Our model of patients age 60 with metastatic GEP-NETs suggests empiric initiation of SSA led to an increase 0.62 unadjusted life-years and incremental increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.44. The incremental costs were $388,966 per QALY and not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. Death was attributed to GEP-NETs for 94.1% of patients in the SSA arm vs. 94.9% of patients in the DELAY SSA arm. Sensitivity analysis found that the model was most sensitive to costs of SSAs. Using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the SSA strategy was only cost-effective 1.4% of the time at a WTP threshold of $100,000 per QALY. Conclusions Our modeling study finds it is not cost-effective to initiate SSAs at time of presentation for patients with metastatic GEP-NETs. Further clinical studies are needed to identify the optimal timing to initiate these drugs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08306-5Neuroendocrine tumorsCost-effectiveness analysisSomatostatin analoguesCarcinoidPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheila D. Rustgi
Aaron Oh
Jeong Yun Yang
Dasol Kang
Edward Wolin
Chung Y. Kong
Chin Hur
Michelle K. Kim
spellingShingle Sheila D. Rustgi
Aaron Oh
Jeong Yun Yang
Dasol Kang
Edward Wolin
Chung Y. Kong
Chin Hur
Michelle K. Kim
Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
BMC Cancer
Neuroendocrine tumors
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Somatostatin analogues
Carcinoid
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
author_facet Sheila D. Rustgi
Aaron Oh
Jeong Yun Yang
Dasol Kang
Edward Wolin
Chung Y. Kong
Chin Hur
Michelle K. Kim
author_sort Sheila D. Rustgi
title Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Initiation of Somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort initiation of somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumor patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background & Aims Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms. Although some have a relatively benign and indolent natural history, others can be aggressive and ultimately fatal. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) improve both quality of life and survival for these patients once they develop metastatic disease. However, these drugs are costly and their cost-effectiveness is not known. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed and analyzed to compare two treatment strategies for patients with Stage IV GEP-NETs. The first strategy had all patients start SSA immediately while the second strategy waited, reserving SSA initiation until the patient showed signs of progression. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore model parameter uncertainty. Results Our model of patients age 60 with metastatic GEP-NETs suggests empiric initiation of SSA led to an increase 0.62 unadjusted life-years and incremental increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.44. The incremental costs were $388,966 per QALY and not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. Death was attributed to GEP-NETs for 94.1% of patients in the SSA arm vs. 94.9% of patients in the DELAY SSA arm. Sensitivity analysis found that the model was most sensitive to costs of SSAs. Using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the SSA strategy was only cost-effective 1.4% of the time at a WTP threshold of $100,000 per QALY. Conclusions Our modeling study finds it is not cost-effective to initiate SSAs at time of presentation for patients with metastatic GEP-NETs. Further clinical studies are needed to identify the optimal timing to initiate these drugs.
topic Neuroendocrine tumors
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Somatostatin analogues
Carcinoid
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08306-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sheiladrustgi initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT aaronoh initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT jeongyunyang initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT dasolkang initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT edwardwolin initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT chungykong initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT chinhur initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT michellekkim initiationofsomatostatinanaloguesforneuroendocrinetumorpatientsacosteffectivenessanalysis
_version_ 1721419913738846208