Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)

Thermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Margallo, R. Aldaco, A. Irabien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2013-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094
id doaj-4241707ebe2a4f4ab5a4ec4f68827bc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4241707ebe2a4f4ab5a4ec4f68827bc02021-02-21T21:04:02ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162013-09-013510.3303/CET1335145Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)M. MargalloR. AldacoA. IrabienThermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combustion process. Obviously, after primary measures a secondary treatment is required. The conventional bottom ash management is to carry out a solidification process. This solidification or stabilization process produces a material with physical and mechanical properties that promote a reduction in contaminant release from the residue matrix. Solidification methods commonly make use of inorganic binder reagents such as cement, lime and other pozzolanic materials. Once waste is stabilized, it is usually sent to the landfill. However, despite the heavy metal content, it is getting more and more common the use of this waste as a natural aggregate. In particular, it could be used as a raw material for clinker production, cement mortar or frit production. Other possible management options included its utilization as a drainage layer on a landfill and as a sub-base material in a road construction. In this work it was assessed different bottom ash management options. In this work the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental impact of different bottom ash management options. Specifically, the conventional ash solidification was compared with the ash recycling in Portland cement production.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Margallo
R. Aldaco
A. Irabien
spellingShingle M. Margallo
R. Aldaco
A. Irabien
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet M. Margallo
R. Aldaco
A. Irabien
author_sort M. Margallo
title Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
title_short Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
title_full Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
title_fullStr Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
title_full_unstemmed Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
title_sort life cycle assessment of bottom ash management from a municipal solid waste incinerator (mswi)
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2013-09-01
description Thermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combustion process. Obviously, after primary measures a secondary treatment is required. The conventional bottom ash management is to carry out a solidification process. This solidification or stabilization process produces a material with physical and mechanical properties that promote a reduction in contaminant release from the residue matrix. Solidification methods commonly make use of inorganic binder reagents such as cement, lime and other pozzolanic materials. Once waste is stabilized, it is usually sent to the landfill. However, despite the heavy metal content, it is getting more and more common the use of this waste as a natural aggregate. In particular, it could be used as a raw material for clinker production, cement mortar or frit production. Other possible management options included its utilization as a drainage layer on a landfill and as a sub-base material in a road construction. In this work it was assessed different bottom ash management options. In this work the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental impact of different bottom ash management options. Specifically, the conventional ash solidification was compared with the ash recycling in Portland cement production.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094
work_keys_str_mv AT mmargallo lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi
AT raldaco lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi
AT airabien lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi
_version_ 1724257457316823040