Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)
Thermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Chemical Engineering Transactions |
Online Access: | https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094 |
id |
doaj-4241707ebe2a4f4ab5a4ec4f68827bc0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4241707ebe2a4f4ab5a4ec4f68827bc02021-02-21T21:04:02ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162013-09-013510.3303/CET1335145Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI)M. MargalloR. AldacoA. IrabienThermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combustion process. Obviously, after primary measures a secondary treatment is required. The conventional bottom ash management is to carry out a solidification process. This solidification or stabilization process produces a material with physical and mechanical properties that promote a reduction in contaminant release from the residue matrix. Solidification methods commonly make use of inorganic binder reagents such as cement, lime and other pozzolanic materials. Once waste is stabilized, it is usually sent to the landfill. However, despite the heavy metal content, it is getting more and more common the use of this waste as a natural aggregate. In particular, it could be used as a raw material for clinker production, cement mortar or frit production. Other possible management options included its utilization as a drainage layer on a landfill and as a sub-base material in a road construction. In this work it was assessed different bottom ash management options. In this work the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental impact of different bottom ash management options. Specifically, the conventional ash solidification was compared with the ash recycling in Portland cement production.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Margallo R. Aldaco A. Irabien |
spellingShingle |
M. Margallo R. Aldaco A. Irabien Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) Chemical Engineering Transactions |
author_facet |
M. Margallo R. Aldaco A. Irabien |
author_sort |
M. Margallo |
title |
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) |
title_short |
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) |
title_full |
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) |
title_fullStr |
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Life Cycle Assessment of Bottom Ash Management from a Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator (MSWI) |
title_sort |
life cycle assessment of bottom ash management from a municipal solid waste incinerator (mswi) |
publisher |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. |
series |
Chemical Engineering Transactions |
issn |
2283-9216 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
Thermal treatment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) results in various types of solid wastes, distinguishing mainly bottom, boiler and fly ashes and slag. To minimise waste generation it necessary to carry out primary measures for controlling residue outputs that involve optimising control of the combustion process. Obviously, after primary measures a secondary treatment is required. The conventional bottom ash management is to carry out a solidification process. This solidification or stabilization process produces a material with physical and mechanical properties that promote a reduction in contaminant release from the residue matrix. Solidification methods commonly make use of inorganic binder reagents such as cement, lime and other pozzolanic materials. Once waste is stabilized, it is usually sent to the landfill. However, despite the heavy metal content, it is getting more and more common the use of this waste as a natural aggregate. In particular, it could be used as a raw material for clinker production, cement mortar or frit production. Other possible management options included its utilization as a drainage layer on a landfill and as a sub-base material in a road construction. In this work it was assessed different bottom ash management options. In this work the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental impact of different bottom ash management options. Specifically, the conventional ash solidification was compared with the ash recycling in Portland cement production. |
url |
https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6094 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mmargallo lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi AT raldaco lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi AT airabien lifecycleassessmentofbottomashmanagementfromamunicipalsolidwasteincineratormswi |
_version_ |
1724257457316823040 |