An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.

OBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martha Nowosielski, Matthew D DiFranco, Daniel Putzer, Marcel Seiz, Wolfgang Recheis, Andreas H Jacobs, Günther Stockhammer, Markus Hutterer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render
id doaj-42568a444b0346baaaf5b55154599bef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42568a444b0346baaaf5b55154599bef2020-11-25T01:19:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9583010.1371/journal.pone.0095830An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.Martha NowosielskiMatthew D DiFrancoDaniel PutzerMarcel SeizWolfgang RecheisAndreas H JacobsGünther StockhammerMarkus HuttererOBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morphologic tumor volumes on MRI (post-contrast T1 (cT1) and T2 images) were calculated using a semi-automatic image segmentation method. Metabolic tumor volumes for [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PETs were determined by image segmentation using a threshold-based volume of interest analysis. After co-registration with MRI the morphologic and metabolic tumor volumes were compared on an intra-individual basis in order to estimate spatial overlaps using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: [18F]-FLT uptake was negative in tumors with no or only moderate contrast enhancement on MRI, detecting only 21 of 23 (91%) HGG. In addition, [18F]-FLT uptake was mainly restricted to cT1 tumor areas on MRI and [18F]-FLT volumes strongly correlated with cT1 volumes (r = 0.841, p<0.001). In contrast, [18F]-FET PET detected 22 of 23 (96%) HGG. [18F]-FET uptake beyond areas of cT1 was found in 61% of cases and [18F]-FET volumes showed only a moderate correlation with cT1 volumes (r = 0.573, p<0.001). Metabolic tumor volumes beyond cT1 tumor areas were significantly larger for [18F]-FET compared to [18F]-FLT tracer uptake (8.3 vs. 2.7 cm3, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In HGG [18F]-FET but not [18F]-FLT PET was able to detect metabolic active tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancing tumor on MRI. In contrast to [18F]-FET, blood-brain barrier breakdown seems to be a prerequisite for [18F]-FLT tracer uptake.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martha Nowosielski
Matthew D DiFranco
Daniel Putzer
Marcel Seiz
Wolfgang Recheis
Andreas H Jacobs
Günther Stockhammer
Markus Hutterer
spellingShingle Martha Nowosielski
Matthew D DiFranco
Daniel Putzer
Marcel Seiz
Wolfgang Recheis
Andreas H Jacobs
Günther Stockhammer
Markus Hutterer
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Martha Nowosielski
Matthew D DiFranco
Daniel Putzer
Marcel Seiz
Wolfgang Recheis
Andreas H Jacobs
Günther Stockhammer
Markus Hutterer
author_sort Martha Nowosielski
title An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
title_short An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
title_full An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
title_fullStr An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
title_full_unstemmed An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
title_sort intra-individual comparison of mri, [18f]-fet and [18f]-flt pet in patients with high-grade gliomas.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description OBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morphologic tumor volumes on MRI (post-contrast T1 (cT1) and T2 images) were calculated using a semi-automatic image segmentation method. Metabolic tumor volumes for [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PETs were determined by image segmentation using a threshold-based volume of interest analysis. After co-registration with MRI the morphologic and metabolic tumor volumes were compared on an intra-individual basis in order to estimate spatial overlaps using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: [18F]-FLT uptake was negative in tumors with no or only moderate contrast enhancement on MRI, detecting only 21 of 23 (91%) HGG. In addition, [18F]-FLT uptake was mainly restricted to cT1 tumor areas on MRI and [18F]-FLT volumes strongly correlated with cT1 volumes (r = 0.841, p<0.001). In contrast, [18F]-FET PET detected 22 of 23 (96%) HGG. [18F]-FET uptake beyond areas of cT1 was found in 61% of cases and [18F]-FET volumes showed only a moderate correlation with cT1 volumes (r = 0.573, p<0.001). Metabolic tumor volumes beyond cT1 tumor areas were significantly larger for [18F]-FET compared to [18F]-FLT tracer uptake (8.3 vs. 2.7 cm3, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In HGG [18F]-FET but not [18F]-FLT PET was able to detect metabolic active tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancing tumor on MRI. In contrast to [18F]-FET, blood-brain barrier breakdown seems to be a prerequisite for [18F]-FLT tracer uptake.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marthanowosielski anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT matthewddifranco anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT danielputzer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT marcelseiz anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT wolfgangrecheis anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT andreashjacobs anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT guntherstockhammer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT markushutterer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT marthanowosielski intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT matthewddifranco intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT danielputzer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT marcelseiz intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT wolfgangrecheis intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT andreashjacobs intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT guntherstockhammer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
AT markushutterer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas
_version_ 1725139824857317376