An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.
OBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morph...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-42568a444b0346baaaf5b55154599bef |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-42568a444b0346baaaf5b55154599bef2020-11-25T01:19:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9583010.1371/journal.pone.0095830An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas.Martha NowosielskiMatthew D DiFrancoDaniel PutzerMarcel SeizWolfgang RecheisAndreas H JacobsGünther StockhammerMarkus HuttererOBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morphologic tumor volumes on MRI (post-contrast T1 (cT1) and T2 images) were calculated using a semi-automatic image segmentation method. Metabolic tumor volumes for [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PETs were determined by image segmentation using a threshold-based volume of interest analysis. After co-registration with MRI the morphologic and metabolic tumor volumes were compared on an intra-individual basis in order to estimate spatial overlaps using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: [18F]-FLT uptake was negative in tumors with no or only moderate contrast enhancement on MRI, detecting only 21 of 23 (91%) HGG. In addition, [18F]-FLT uptake was mainly restricted to cT1 tumor areas on MRI and [18F]-FLT volumes strongly correlated with cT1 volumes (r = 0.841, p<0.001). In contrast, [18F]-FET PET detected 22 of 23 (96%) HGG. [18F]-FET uptake beyond areas of cT1 was found in 61% of cases and [18F]-FET volumes showed only a moderate correlation with cT1 volumes (r = 0.573, p<0.001). Metabolic tumor volumes beyond cT1 tumor areas were significantly larger for [18F]-FET compared to [18F]-FLT tracer uptake (8.3 vs. 2.7 cm3, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In HGG [18F]-FET but not [18F]-FLT PET was able to detect metabolic active tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancing tumor on MRI. In contrast to [18F]-FET, blood-brain barrier breakdown seems to be a prerequisite for [18F]-FLT tracer uptake.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martha Nowosielski Matthew D DiFranco Daniel Putzer Marcel Seiz Wolfgang Recheis Andreas H Jacobs Günther Stockhammer Markus Hutterer |
spellingShingle |
Martha Nowosielski Matthew D DiFranco Daniel Putzer Marcel Seiz Wolfgang Recheis Andreas H Jacobs Günther Stockhammer Markus Hutterer An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Martha Nowosielski Matthew D DiFranco Daniel Putzer Marcel Seiz Wolfgang Recheis Andreas H Jacobs Günther Stockhammer Markus Hutterer |
author_sort |
Martha Nowosielski |
title |
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
title_short |
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
title_full |
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
title_fullStr |
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
title_full_unstemmed |
An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
title_sort |
intra-individual comparison of mri, [18f]-fet and [18f]-flt pet in patients with high-grade gliomas. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Intra-individual spatial overlap analysis of tumor volumes assessed by MRI, the amino acid PET tracer [18F]-FET and the nucleoside PET tracer [18F]-FLT in high-grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET data sets were retrospectively analyzed in 23 HGG patients. Morphologic tumor volumes on MRI (post-contrast T1 (cT1) and T2 images) were calculated using a semi-automatic image segmentation method. Metabolic tumor volumes for [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PETs were determined by image segmentation using a threshold-based volume of interest analysis. After co-registration with MRI the morphologic and metabolic tumor volumes were compared on an intra-individual basis in order to estimate spatial overlaps using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: [18F]-FLT uptake was negative in tumors with no or only moderate contrast enhancement on MRI, detecting only 21 of 23 (91%) HGG. In addition, [18F]-FLT uptake was mainly restricted to cT1 tumor areas on MRI and [18F]-FLT volumes strongly correlated with cT1 volumes (r = 0.841, p<0.001). In contrast, [18F]-FET PET detected 22 of 23 (96%) HGG. [18F]-FET uptake beyond areas of cT1 was found in 61% of cases and [18F]-FET volumes showed only a moderate correlation with cT1 volumes (r = 0.573, p<0.001). Metabolic tumor volumes beyond cT1 tumor areas were significantly larger for [18F]-FET compared to [18F]-FLT tracer uptake (8.3 vs. 2.7 cm3, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In HGG [18F]-FET but not [18F]-FLT PET was able to detect metabolic active tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancing tumor on MRI. In contrast to [18F]-FET, blood-brain barrier breakdown seems to be a prerequisite for [18F]-FLT tracer uptake. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997484?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marthanowosielski anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT matthewddifranco anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT danielputzer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT marcelseiz anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT wolfgangrecheis anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT andreashjacobs anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT guntherstockhammer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT markushutterer anintraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT marthanowosielski intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT matthewddifranco intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT danielputzer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT marcelseiz intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT wolfgangrecheis intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT andreashjacobs intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT guntherstockhammer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas AT markushutterer intraindividualcomparisonofmri18ffetand18ffltpetinpatientswithhighgradegliomas |
_version_ |
1725139824857317376 |