Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
The High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly co...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
1997-09-01
|
Series: | Annales Geophysicae |
Online Access: | https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf |
id |
doaj-425e85b804fb49d796e967c38bc09fd9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-425e85b804fb49d796e967c38bc09fd92020-11-24T23:40:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05761997-09-01151089109810.1007/s00585-997-1089-8Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurementsM. D. Burrage0W. R. Skinner1P. B. Hays2Space Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USASpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USASpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAThe High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly coincident in space and time, each provides a very e.ective validation test of the other. Discrepancies due to geophysical di.erences should be much smaller than for comparisons with other techniques (radars, rockets, etc.), and the very large sizes of the coincident data sets provide excellent statistics for the study. Issues that have been examined include relative systematic o.sets and the wind magnitudes obtained with the two systems. A significant zero wind position di.erence of ~6 m s<sup>–1</sup> is identified for the zonal component, and it appears that this arises from an absolute perturbation in WINDII winds of –4 m s<sup>–1</sup> and in HRDI of +2 m s<sup>–1</sup>. Altitude o.sets appear to be relatively small, and do not exceed 1 km. In addition, no evidence is found for the existence of a systematic wind speed bias between HRDI and WINDII. However, considerable day-to-day variability is found in the quality of the agreement, and RMS di.erences are surprisingly large, typically in the range of 20±30 m s<sup>–1</sup>.https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. D. Burrage W. R. Skinner P. B. Hays |
spellingShingle |
M. D. Burrage W. R. Skinner P. B. Hays Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements Annales Geophysicae |
author_facet |
M. D. Burrage W. R. Skinner P. B. Hays |
author_sort |
M. D. Burrage |
title |
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements |
title_short |
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements |
title_full |
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements |
title_fullStr |
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements |
title_sort |
intercalibration of hrdi and windii wind measurements |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Annales Geophysicae |
issn |
0992-7689 1432-0576 |
publishDate |
1997-09-01 |
description |
The High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI)
and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in-
struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere
Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the
Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because
the two observation sets are frequently nearly coincident
in space and time, each provides a very e.ective
validation test of the other. Discrepancies due to
geophysical di.erences should be much smaller than
for comparisons with other techniques (radars, rockets,
etc.), and the very large sizes of the coincident data sets
provide excellent statistics for the study. Issues that have
been examined include relative systematic o.sets and the
wind magnitudes obtained with the two systems. A
significant zero wind position di.erence of ~6 m s<sup>–1</sup> is
identified for the zonal component, and it appears that
this arises from an absolute perturbation in WINDII
winds of –4 m s<sup>–1</sup> and in HRDI of +2 m s<sup>–1</sup>. Altitude
o.sets appear to be relatively small, and do not exceed
1 km. In addition, no evidence is found for the existence
of a systematic wind speed bias between HRDI and
WINDII. However, considerable day-to-day variability
is found in the quality of the agreement, and RMS
di.erences are surprisingly large, typically in the range
of 20±30 m s<sup>–1</sup>. |
url |
https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mdburrage intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements AT wrskinner intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements AT pbhays intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements |
_version_ |
1725509176778555392 |