Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements

The High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. D. Burrage, W. R. Skinner, P. B. Hays
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1997-09-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf
id doaj-425e85b804fb49d796e967c38bc09fd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-425e85b804fb49d796e967c38bc09fd92020-11-24T23:40:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05761997-09-01151089109810.1007/s00585-997-1089-8Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurementsM. D. Burrage0W. R. Skinner1P. B. Hays2Space Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USASpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USASpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAThe High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly coincident in space and time, each provides a very e.ective validation test of the other. Discrepancies due to geophysical di.erences should be much smaller than for comparisons with other techniques (radars, rockets, etc.), and the very large sizes of the coincident data sets provide excellent statistics for the study. Issues that have been examined include relative systematic o.sets and the wind magnitudes obtained with the two systems. A significant zero wind position di.erence of ~6 m s<sup>–1</sup> is identified for the zonal component, and it appears that this arises from an absolute perturbation in WINDII winds of –4 m s<sup>–1</sup> and in HRDI of +2 m s<sup>–1</sup>. Altitude o.sets appear to be relatively small, and do not exceed 1 km. In addition, no evidence is found for the existence of a systematic wind speed bias between HRDI and WINDII. However, considerable day-to-day variability is found in the quality of the agreement, and RMS di.erences are surprisingly large, typically in the range of 20±30 m s<sup>–1</sup>.https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. D. Burrage
W. R. Skinner
P. B. Hays
spellingShingle M. D. Burrage
W. R. Skinner
P. B. Hays
Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet M. D. Burrage
W. R. Skinner
P. B. Hays
author_sort M. D. Burrage
title Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
title_short Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
title_full Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
title_fullStr Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
title_full_unstemmed Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements
title_sort intercalibration of hrdi and windii wind measurements
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 1997-09-01
description The High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly coincident in space and time, each provides a very e.ective validation test of the other. Discrepancies due to geophysical di.erences should be much smaller than for comparisons with other techniques (radars, rockets, etc.), and the very large sizes of the coincident data sets provide excellent statistics for the study. Issues that have been examined include relative systematic o.sets and the wind magnitudes obtained with the two systems. A significant zero wind position di.erence of ~6 m s<sup>–1</sup> is identified for the zonal component, and it appears that this arises from an absolute perturbation in WINDII winds of –4 m s<sup>–1</sup> and in HRDI of +2 m s<sup>–1</sup>. Altitude o.sets appear to be relatively small, and do not exceed 1 km. In addition, no evidence is found for the existence of a systematic wind speed bias between HRDI and WINDII. However, considerable day-to-day variability is found in the quality of the agreement, and RMS di.erences are surprisingly large, typically in the range of 20±30 m s<sup>–1</sup>.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/15/1089/1997/angeo-15-1089-1997.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mdburrage intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements
AT wrskinner intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements
AT pbhays intercalibrationofhrdiandwindiiwindmeasurements
_version_ 1725509176778555392