A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Background The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 |
id |
doaj-426831030c2a4d57a45d5406f461d372 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-426831030c2a4d57a45d5406f461d3722020-11-25T03:07:54ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty2471-54922020-05-01410.1177/2471549220926826A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance ImagingNicholas J. Maister BMBSAndrew Hely BMBS Liam G. Twycross BMBSStephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhDRichard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthABackground The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. Methods MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). Discussion We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicholas J. Maister BMBS Andrew Hely BMBS Liam G. Twycross BMBS Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA |
spellingShingle |
Nicholas J. Maister BMBS Andrew Hely BMBS Liam G. Twycross BMBS Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty |
author_facet |
Nicholas J. Maister BMBS Andrew Hely BMBS Liam G. Twycross BMBS Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA |
author_sort |
Nicholas J. Maister BMBS |
title |
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short |
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full |
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr |
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort |
new method for measuring glenoid version on standard magnetic resonance imaging |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty |
issn |
2471-5492 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Background The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. Methods MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). Discussion We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholasjmaisterbmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT andrewhelybmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT liamgtwycrossbmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT stephendgillbphysiophd anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT richardspagebmedscimbbsfracsorthfaortha anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT nicholasjmaisterbmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT andrewhelybmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT liamgtwycrossbmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT stephendgillbphysiophd newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT richardspagebmedscimbbsfracsorthfaortha newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging |
_version_ |
1724668566798598144 |