A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas J. Maister BMBS, Andrew Hely BMBS, Liam G. Twycross BMBS, Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD, Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826
id doaj-426831030c2a4d57a45d5406f461d372
record_format Article
spelling doaj-426831030c2a4d57a45d5406f461d3722020-11-25T03:07:54ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty2471-54922020-05-01410.1177/2471549220926826A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance ImagingNicholas J. Maister BMBSAndrew Hely BMBS Liam G. Twycross BMBSStephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhDRichard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthABackground The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. Methods MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). Discussion We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholas J. Maister BMBS
Andrew Hely BMBS
Liam G. Twycross BMBS
Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD
Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA
spellingShingle Nicholas J. Maister BMBS
Andrew Hely BMBS
Liam G. Twycross BMBS
Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD
Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
author_facet Nicholas J. Maister BMBS
Andrew Hely BMBS
Liam G. Twycross BMBS
Stephen D. Gill BPhysio, PhD
Richard S. Page BMedSci, MB, BS, FRACS (Orth), FAOrthA
author_sort Nicholas J. Maister BMBS
title A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort new method for measuring glenoid version on standard magnetic resonance imaging
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
issn 2471-5492
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. Methods MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). Discussion We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasjmaisterbmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT andrewhelybmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT liamgtwycrossbmbs anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT stephendgillbphysiophd anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT richardspagebmedscimbbsfracsorthfaortha anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT nicholasjmaisterbmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT andrewhelybmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT liamgtwycrossbmbs newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT stephendgillbphysiophd newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT richardspagebmedscimbbsfracsorthfaortha newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
_version_ 1724668566798598144