Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?

Potent antimicrobial agents have been developed as a response to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which especially affect patients with prolonged hospitalization in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and who had been previously treated with antimicrobials, especially third-generation cephal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa M. Jukemura, Marcelo N. Burattini, Carlos A.P. Pereira, Alfésio L.F. Braga, Eduardo A.S. Medeiros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier
Series:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000400010&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-4288573ecda04c228dd8658747a88c90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4288573ecda04c228dd8658747a88c902020-11-25T03:49:51ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1678-439111441842210.1590/S1413-86702007000400010S1413-86702007000400010Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?Elisa M. Jukemura0Marcelo N. Burattini1Carlos A.P. Pereira2Alfésio L.F. Braga3Eduardo A.S. Medeiros4Universidade Federal de São PauloUniversidade Federal de São PauloUniversidade Federal de São PauloCatholic University of SantosUniversidade Federal de São PauloPotent antimicrobial agents have been developed as a response to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which especially affect patients with prolonged hospitalization in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and who had been previously treated with antimicrobials, especially third-generation cephalosporins.This study was to determine how changes in the empirical treatment of infections in ICU patients affect the incidence of Gram-negative bacteria species and their susceptibility to antimicrobials, and examine the impact of these changes on nosocomial infections. A prospective interventional study was performed in a university hospital during two periods: 1) First period (September 1999 to February 2000); and 2) Second period (August 2000 to December 2000); empirical treatment was changed from ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime in the first period to piperacillin/tazobactam in the second. ICU epidemiological and infection control rates, as well as bacterial isolates from upper airways were analyzed. Ceftazidime consumption dropped from 34.83 to 0.85 DDD/1000 patients per day (p=0.004). Piperacillin/tazobactam was originally not available; its consumption reached 157.07 DDD/1000 patients per day in the second period (p=0.0002). Eighty-seven patients and 66 patients were evaluated for upper airway colonization in the first and second periods, respectively. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of K. pneumoniae (p=0.004) and P. mirabilis (p=0.036), restoration of K. pneumoniae susceptibility to cephalosporins (p<0.0001) and reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia rates (p<0.0001). However, there was an increase in P. aeruginosa incidence (p=0.005) and increases in ceftazidime (p=0.003) and meropenem (p<0.0001) susceptibilities. Changing antimicrobial selective pressure on multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria helps control ventilator-associated pneumonia and decreases antimicrobial resistance.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000400010&lng=en&tlng=enVentilator associated pneumoniamulti-resistant bacteriainfection control
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elisa M. Jukemura
Marcelo N. Burattini
Carlos A.P. Pereira
Alfésio L.F. Braga
Eduardo A.S. Medeiros
spellingShingle Elisa M. Jukemura
Marcelo N. Burattini
Carlos A.P. Pereira
Alfésio L.F. Braga
Eduardo A.S. Medeiros
Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Ventilator associated pneumonia
multi-resistant bacteria
infection control
author_facet Elisa M. Jukemura
Marcelo N. Burattini
Carlos A.P. Pereira
Alfésio L.F. Braga
Eduardo A.S. Medeiros
author_sort Elisa M. Jukemura
title Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
title_short Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
title_full Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
title_fullStr Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
title_full_unstemmed Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
title_sort control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1678-4391
description Potent antimicrobial agents have been developed as a response to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which especially affect patients with prolonged hospitalization in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and who had been previously treated with antimicrobials, especially third-generation cephalosporins.This study was to determine how changes in the empirical treatment of infections in ICU patients affect the incidence of Gram-negative bacteria species and their susceptibility to antimicrobials, and examine the impact of these changes on nosocomial infections. A prospective interventional study was performed in a university hospital during two periods: 1) First period (September 1999 to February 2000); and 2) Second period (August 2000 to December 2000); empirical treatment was changed from ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime in the first period to piperacillin/tazobactam in the second. ICU epidemiological and infection control rates, as well as bacterial isolates from upper airways were analyzed. Ceftazidime consumption dropped from 34.83 to 0.85 DDD/1000 patients per day (p=0.004). Piperacillin/tazobactam was originally not available; its consumption reached 157.07 DDD/1000 patients per day in the second period (p=0.0002). Eighty-seven patients and 66 patients were evaluated for upper airway colonization in the first and second periods, respectively. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of K. pneumoniae (p=0.004) and P. mirabilis (p=0.036), restoration of K. pneumoniae susceptibility to cephalosporins (p<0.0001) and reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia rates (p<0.0001). However, there was an increase in P. aeruginosa incidence (p=0.005) and increases in ceftazidime (p=0.003) and meropenem (p<0.0001) susceptibilities. Changing antimicrobial selective pressure on multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria helps control ventilator-associated pneumonia and decreases antimicrobial resistance.
topic Ventilator associated pneumonia
multi-resistant bacteria
infection control
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000400010&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT elisamjukemura controlofmultiresistantbacteriaandventilatorassociatedpneumoniaisitpossiblewithchangesinantibiotics
AT marcelonburattini controlofmultiresistantbacteriaandventilatorassociatedpneumoniaisitpossiblewithchangesinantibiotics
AT carlosappereira controlofmultiresistantbacteriaandventilatorassociatedpneumoniaisitpossiblewithchangesinantibiotics
AT alfesiolfbraga controlofmultiresistantbacteriaandventilatorassociatedpneumoniaisitpossiblewithchangesinantibiotics
AT eduardoasmedeiros controlofmultiresistantbacteriaandventilatorassociatedpneumoniaisitpossiblewithchangesinantibiotics
_version_ 1724493823450546176