Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies

Objective Autoantibodies to the α3 chain noncollagen 1 domain of type IV collagen (α3(IV)NC1) are a serological hallmark in the diagnosis of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Tan, Wei Pang, Xiaoyu Jia, Ming-hui Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Renal Failure
Subjects:
gbm
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2019.1702056
id doaj-42abeb4e687f493ab85510f42ba03853
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42abeb4e687f493ab85510f42ba038532021-03-18T14:42:05ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRenal Failure0886-022X1525-60492020-01-01421485310.1080/0886022X.2019.17020561702056Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodiesYing Tan0Wei Pang1Xiaoyu Jia2Ming-hui Zhao3Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First HospitalRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First HospitalRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First HospitalRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First HospitalObjective Autoantibodies to the α3 chain noncollagen 1 domain of type IV collagen (α3(IV)NC1) are a serological hallmark in the diagnosis of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody detection by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods Sera from outpatients who were suspected to have anti-GBM disease and 31 patients with biopsy-proven anti-GBM disease were collected. Thirty normal controls were also included. All samples were tested for anti-GBM antibodies by CIA and commercial ELISA. The anti-GBM antibody-positive samples were confirmed by a homemade ELISA coated with recombinant human α3(IV)NC1. Results Compared with detection of anti-GBM antibodies with ELISA, detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA showed a positivity agreement of 70% and a negativity agreement of 98.6%. Among the 4 patients with different results, the anti-GBM antibody detection by CIA was in agreement with the homemade ELISA coated with recombinant human α3(IV)NC1 and the clinical diagnosis. In 31 patients with anti-GBM disease, good agreement was achieved in the detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA, commercial ELISA and the homemade ELISA (100%, 100%). The AUC for CIA and commercial ELISA was 0.987 and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions The detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity and was in good agreement with our homemade ELISA, which seems better than the commercial ELISA in suspected anti-GBM disease patients. The three assays performed in parallel in the diagnosis of anti-GBM disease patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2019.1702056autoantibodiesgbmgoodpasture’s syndromerapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis (rpgn)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ying Tan
Wei Pang
Xiaoyu Jia
Ming-hui Zhao
spellingShingle Ying Tan
Wei Pang
Xiaoyu Jia
Ming-hui Zhao
Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
Renal Failure
autoantibodies
gbm
goodpasture’s syndrome
rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis (rpgn)
author_facet Ying Tan
Wei Pang
Xiaoyu Jia
Ming-hui Zhao
author_sort Ying Tan
title Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
title_short Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
title_full Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
title_fullStr Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an ELISA for detection of anti-GBM antibodies
title_sort comparison of the performance of a chemiluminescence assay and an elisa for detection of anti-gbm antibodies
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Renal Failure
issn 0886-022X
1525-6049
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objective Autoantibodies to the α3 chain noncollagen 1 domain of type IV collagen (α3(IV)NC1) are a serological hallmark in the diagnosis of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody detection by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods Sera from outpatients who were suspected to have anti-GBM disease and 31 patients with biopsy-proven anti-GBM disease were collected. Thirty normal controls were also included. All samples were tested for anti-GBM antibodies by CIA and commercial ELISA. The anti-GBM antibody-positive samples were confirmed by a homemade ELISA coated with recombinant human α3(IV)NC1. Results Compared with detection of anti-GBM antibodies with ELISA, detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA showed a positivity agreement of 70% and a negativity agreement of 98.6%. Among the 4 patients with different results, the anti-GBM antibody detection by CIA was in agreement with the homemade ELISA coated with recombinant human α3(IV)NC1 and the clinical diagnosis. In 31 patients with anti-GBM disease, good agreement was achieved in the detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA, commercial ELISA and the homemade ELISA (100%, 100%). The AUC for CIA and commercial ELISA was 0.987 and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions The detection of anti-GBM antibodies with CIA demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity and was in good agreement with our homemade ELISA, which seems better than the commercial ELISA in suspected anti-GBM disease patients. The three assays performed in parallel in the diagnosis of anti-GBM disease patients.
topic autoantibodies
gbm
goodpasture’s syndrome
rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis (rpgn)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2019.1702056
work_keys_str_mv AT yingtan comparisonoftheperformanceofachemiluminescenceassayandanelisafordetectionofantigbmantibodies
AT weipang comparisonoftheperformanceofachemiluminescenceassayandanelisafordetectionofantigbmantibodies
AT xiaoyujia comparisonoftheperformanceofachemiluminescenceassayandanelisafordetectionofantigbmantibodies
AT minghuizhao comparisonoftheperformanceofachemiluminescenceassayandanelisafordetectionofantigbmantibodies
_version_ 1724215878087606272