Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN

Abstract Background Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erika Cottrell, Blair G. Darney, Miguel Marino, Anna Rose Templeton, Lorie Jacob, Megan Hoopes, Maria Rodriguez, Brigit Hatch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y
id doaj-42af211973b5478b9f109f0043a2e38e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42af211973b5478b9f109f0043a2e38e2020-11-25T03:18:24ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052019-06-0117111010.1186/s12961-019-0445-yStudy protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMANErika Cottrell0Blair G. Darney1Miguel Marino2Anna Rose Templeton3Lorie Jacob4Megan Hoopes5Maria Rodriguez6Brigit Hatch7OCHIN, IncOregon Health and Science UniversityOregon Health and Science UniversityOCHIN, IncOCHIN, IncOCHIN, IncOregon Health and Science UniversityOregon Health and Science UniversityAbstract Background Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured or unable to pay for care. Women of reproductive age (15–44 years) comprise just of a quarter (26%) of the total CHC patient population, with higher than average proportions of women of colour, women with lower income and educational status and social challenges (e.g. housing). Such factors are associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes across contraceptive, preventive and pregnancy-related services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) prioritised reproductive health as an essential component of women’s preventive services to counter these barriers and increase women’s access to care. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled ACA implementation through Medicaid expansion as optional, creating a natural experiment to measure the ACA’s impact on women’s reproductive care delivery and health outcomes. Methods This paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods study comparing women’s contraceptive, preventive, prenatal and postpartum care before and after ACA implementation and between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Quantitative assessment will leverage electronic health record data from the ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, a network of over 130 CHCs in 24 states, to describe care and identify patient, practice and state-level factors associated with provision of recommended evidence-based care. Qualitative assessment will include patient, provider and practice level interviews to understand perceptions and utilisation of reproductive healthcare in CHC settings. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first study using patient level electronic health record data from multiple states to assess the impact of ACA implementation in conjunction with other practice and policy level factors such as Title X funding or 1115 Medicaid waivers. Findings will be relevant to policy and practice, informing efforts to enhance the provision of timely, evidence-based reproductive care, improve health outcomes and reduce disparities among women. Patient, provider and practice-level interviews will serve to contextualise our findings and develop subsequent studies and interventions to support women’s healthcare provision in CHC settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-yWomen’s healthreproductive healthelectronic health recordscommunity health centresAffordable Care Actcontraceptive care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erika Cottrell
Blair G. Darney
Miguel Marino
Anna Rose Templeton
Lorie Jacob
Megan Hoopes
Maria Rodriguez
Brigit Hatch
spellingShingle Erika Cottrell
Blair G. Darney
Miguel Marino
Anna Rose Templeton
Lorie Jacob
Megan Hoopes
Maria Rodriguez
Brigit Hatch
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
Health Research Policy and Systems
Women’s health
reproductive health
electronic health records
community health centres
Affordable Care Act
contraceptive care
author_facet Erika Cottrell
Blair G. Darney
Miguel Marino
Anna Rose Templeton
Lorie Jacob
Megan Hoopes
Maria Rodriguez
Brigit Hatch
author_sort Erika Cottrell
title Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_short Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_full Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_fullStr Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_sort study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after affordable care act implementation – everywoman
publisher BMC
series Health Research Policy and Systems
issn 1478-4505
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured or unable to pay for care. Women of reproductive age (15–44 years) comprise just of a quarter (26%) of the total CHC patient population, with higher than average proportions of women of colour, women with lower income and educational status and social challenges (e.g. housing). Such factors are associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes across contraceptive, preventive and pregnancy-related services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) prioritised reproductive health as an essential component of women’s preventive services to counter these barriers and increase women’s access to care. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled ACA implementation through Medicaid expansion as optional, creating a natural experiment to measure the ACA’s impact on women’s reproductive care delivery and health outcomes. Methods This paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods study comparing women’s contraceptive, preventive, prenatal and postpartum care before and after ACA implementation and between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Quantitative assessment will leverage electronic health record data from the ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, a network of over 130 CHCs in 24 states, to describe care and identify patient, practice and state-level factors associated with provision of recommended evidence-based care. Qualitative assessment will include patient, provider and practice level interviews to understand perceptions and utilisation of reproductive healthcare in CHC settings. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first study using patient level electronic health record data from multiple states to assess the impact of ACA implementation in conjunction with other practice and policy level factors such as Title X funding or 1115 Medicaid waivers. Findings will be relevant to policy and practice, informing efforts to enhance the provision of timely, evidence-based reproductive care, improve health outcomes and reduce disparities among women. Patient, provider and practice-level interviews will serve to contextualise our findings and develop subsequent studies and interventions to support women’s healthcare provision in CHC settings.
topic Women’s health
reproductive health
electronic health records
community health centres
Affordable Care Act
contraceptive care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y
work_keys_str_mv AT erikacottrell studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT blairgdarney studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT miguelmarino studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT annarosetempleton studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT loriejacob studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT meganhoopes studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT mariarodriguez studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT brigithatch studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
_version_ 1724626849440464896