Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles

Infestations of buildings by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile (Mayr), were monitored on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles. Foraging ant activity peaked during the hotter months of the year. The mean monthly maximum temperature, but not rainfall, positively correlated with ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smadar Gilboa, John H. Klotz, Peter Nonacs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/925149
id doaj-42d8a8277e53424ba9a3256839936b49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42d8a8277e53424ba9a3256839936b492020-11-24T23:48:05ZengHindawi LimitedPsyche: A Journal of Entomology0033-26151687-74382012-01-01201210.1155/2012/925149925149Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los AngelesSmadar Gilboa0John H. Klotz1Peter Nonacs2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 621 Young Dr. S., University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 621 Young Dr. S., University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAInfestations of buildings by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile (Mayr), were monitored on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles. Foraging ant activity peaked during the hotter months of the year. The mean monthly maximum temperature, but not rainfall, positively correlated with indoor infestation frequency. Neither garden size nor the predominant groundcover vegetation correlated with the number of foraging ants at baits within gardens. Although the number of foraging ants outside a building varied over 40-fold, ant density in gardens did not predict the likelihood of infestation within the building. Also, the type of vegetative groundcover employed did not predict infestation frequency. There was, however, a significant negative relationship between the size of the garden outside of a building and the number of infestations. Given the large foraging area of L. humile workers, buildings next to small gardens may be infested simply because they lie within the “normal” foraging area of a colony. The best predictor of which rooms were infested within buildings was the presence of a water source. Thus providing water for ant colonies outside and away from buildings may be one method of integrated pest management to reduce the proclivity of ants to infest structures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/925149
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Smadar Gilboa
John H. Klotz
Peter Nonacs
spellingShingle Smadar Gilboa
John H. Klotz
Peter Nonacs
Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
author_facet Smadar Gilboa
John H. Klotz
Peter Nonacs
author_sort Smadar Gilboa
title Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
title_short Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
title_full Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
title_fullStr Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
title_full_unstemmed Urban Infestation Patterns of Argentine Ants, Linepithema humile, in Los Angeles
title_sort urban infestation patterns of argentine ants, linepithema humile, in los angeles
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
issn 0033-2615
1687-7438
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Infestations of buildings by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile (Mayr), were monitored on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles. Foraging ant activity peaked during the hotter months of the year. The mean monthly maximum temperature, but not rainfall, positively correlated with indoor infestation frequency. Neither garden size nor the predominant groundcover vegetation correlated with the number of foraging ants at baits within gardens. Although the number of foraging ants outside a building varied over 40-fold, ant density in gardens did not predict the likelihood of infestation within the building. Also, the type of vegetative groundcover employed did not predict infestation frequency. There was, however, a significant negative relationship between the size of the garden outside of a building and the number of infestations. Given the large foraging area of L. humile workers, buildings next to small gardens may be infested simply because they lie within the “normal” foraging area of a colony. The best predictor of which rooms were infested within buildings was the presence of a water source. Thus providing water for ant colonies outside and away from buildings may be one method of integrated pest management to reduce the proclivity of ants to infest structures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/925149
work_keys_str_mv AT smadargilboa urbaninfestationpatternsofargentineantslinepithemahumileinlosangeles
AT johnhklotz urbaninfestationpatternsofargentineantslinepithemahumileinlosangeles
AT peternonacs urbaninfestationpatternsofargentineantslinepithemahumileinlosangeles
_version_ 1725487389416095744