Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Abstract Following an application from Probi AB submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Sweden, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the sci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4550
id doaj-42fe68c02dec41cca970ffebd5a28fd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42fe68c02dec41cca970ffebd5a28fd92021-09-09T18:11:54ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322016-07-01147n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4550Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)Abstract Following an application from Probi AB submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Sweden, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption. The food that is the subject of the health claim is ‘Lactobacillus plantarum 299v (Lp299v)’. The Panel considers that Lp299v is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect proposed by the applicant is ‘increase of non‐haem iron absorption’. The target population proposed by the applicant is ‘healthy adults who want to increase their iron uptake’. The Panel considers that increasing non‐haem iron absorption is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that the results of two double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over studies are inconsistent, as one study with some methodological limitations showed a positive effect of Lp299v on non‐haem absorption, whereas the other did not show an effect. The Panel noted that among four single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential studies at risk of systematic bias, three studies showed a positive effect of Lp299v on non‐haem absorption and one did not show an effect. The Panel also took into account that there is no evidence for a plausible mechanism by which Lp299v could increase non‐haem iron absorption in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that the scientific evidence is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of Lp299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4550Lactobacillus plantarum 299vnon‐haem ironabsorptionhealth claim
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
EFSA Journal
Lactobacillus plantarum 299v
non‐haem iron
absorption
health claim
author_facet EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
title Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
title_short Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
title_full Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
title_fullStr Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
title_full_unstemmed Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
title_sort lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to article 13(5) of regulation (ec) no 1924/2006
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Abstract Following an application from Probi AB submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Sweden, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption. The food that is the subject of the health claim is ‘Lactobacillus plantarum 299v (Lp299v)’. The Panel considers that Lp299v is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect proposed by the applicant is ‘increase of non‐haem iron absorption’. The target population proposed by the applicant is ‘healthy adults who want to increase their iron uptake’. The Panel considers that increasing non‐haem iron absorption is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that the results of two double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over studies are inconsistent, as one study with some methodological limitations showed a positive effect of Lp299v on non‐haem absorption, whereas the other did not show an effect. The Panel noted that among four single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential studies at risk of systematic bias, three studies showed a positive effect of Lp299v on non‐haem absorption and one did not show an effect. The Panel also took into account that there is no evidence for a plausible mechanism by which Lp299v could increase non‐haem iron absorption in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that the scientific evidence is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of Lp299v and an increase of non‐haem iron absorption.
topic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v
non‐haem iron
absorption
health claim
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4550
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelondieteticproductsnutritionandallergiesnda lactobacillusplantarum299vandanincreaseofnonhaemironabsorptionevaluationofahealthclaimpursuanttoarticle135ofregulationecno19242006
_version_ 1717758827957321728