The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters

Purpose of the study The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of change of wavelength of flash stimulus and change of check size on the parameters of the visual-evoked potential (VEP) amplitude and latency in normal individuals. Participants and methods The study included 300 eyes of 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mona Abdelkader
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Delta Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.djo.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-9173;year=2016;volume=17;issue=2;spage=73;epage=79;aulast=Abdelkader
id doaj-4304bc2b13a84000ab4a246e6d753051
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4304bc2b13a84000ab4a246e6d7530512021-10-06T13:42:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDelta Journal of Ophthalmology1110-91732090-48352016-01-01172737910.4103/1110-9173.189469The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parametersMona AbdelkaderPurpose of the study The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of change of wavelength of flash stimulus and change of check size on the parameters of the visual-evoked potential (VEP) amplitude and latency in normal individuals. Participants and methods The study included 300 eyes of 150 healthy study participants with age range of 20–45 years. They were exposed to a flash visual-evoked potential (FVEP) with white light and blue color, and to a pattern reversal visual-evoked potential with checks subtending visual angles of 15, 30, 60, and 120 min of arc. The measured data were statistically analyzed and summarized by histograms. The interindividual and intraindividual variability in latencies and amplitudes for FVEP were assessed using the coefficient of variation. Results There were statistically significant differences between blue and white FVEP latencies, whereas there were no statistically significant differences between white and blue FVEP amplitudes. Blue FVEP had less interindividual and intraindividual variability. There was a statistically significant difference in latencies between different check sizes. Conclusion Monochromatic FVEP was preferred than white, as there were minimal interindividual and intraindividual variations of latencies and amplitudes. The most preferred check size in pattern VEP was 120′.http://www.djo.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-9173;year=2016;volume=17;issue=2;spage=73;epage=79;aulast=Abdelkaderamplitudeflash visual-evoked potentiallatencymonochromatic flash visual-evoked potentialpattern visual-evoked potential
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mona Abdelkader
spellingShingle Mona Abdelkader
The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
Delta Journal of Ophthalmology
amplitude
flash visual-evoked potential
latency
monochromatic flash visual-evoked potential
pattern visual-evoked potential
author_facet Mona Abdelkader
author_sort Mona Abdelkader
title The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
title_short The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
title_full The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
title_fullStr The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
title_full_unstemmed The effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
title_sort effect of change of check size and wavelength of stimulus on visual-evoked potential parameters
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Delta Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 1110-9173
2090-4835
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Purpose of the study The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of change of wavelength of flash stimulus and change of check size on the parameters of the visual-evoked potential (VEP) amplitude and latency in normal individuals. Participants and methods The study included 300 eyes of 150 healthy study participants with age range of 20–45 years. They were exposed to a flash visual-evoked potential (FVEP) with white light and blue color, and to a pattern reversal visual-evoked potential with checks subtending visual angles of 15, 30, 60, and 120 min of arc. The measured data were statistically analyzed and summarized by histograms. The interindividual and intraindividual variability in latencies and amplitudes for FVEP were assessed using the coefficient of variation. Results There were statistically significant differences between blue and white FVEP latencies, whereas there were no statistically significant differences between white and blue FVEP amplitudes. Blue FVEP had less interindividual and intraindividual variability. There was a statistically significant difference in latencies between different check sizes. Conclusion Monochromatic FVEP was preferred than white, as there were minimal interindividual and intraindividual variations of latencies and amplitudes. The most preferred check size in pattern VEP was 120′.
topic amplitude
flash visual-evoked potential
latency
monochromatic flash visual-evoked potential
pattern visual-evoked potential
url http://www.djo.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-9173;year=2016;volume=17;issue=2;spage=73;epage=79;aulast=Abdelkader
work_keys_str_mv AT monaabdelkader theeffectofchangeofchecksizeandwavelengthofstimulusonvisualevokedpotentialparameters
AT monaabdelkader effectofchangeofchecksizeandwavelengthofstimulusonvisualevokedpotentialparameters
_version_ 1716840676622073856