Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)

Background: Until now, various types of combined therapy with nucleotide analogs and pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) in patients with hepatitis B patients have been tried. However, studies regarding the benefits of de novo combination, late-add on, and sequential treatment are very limited. The objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dae Won Jun, Sang Bong Ahn, Tae Yeob Kim, Joo Hyun Sohn, Sang Gyune Kim, Se Whan Lee, Byung Ho Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Ja Kyung Kim, Hyoung Su Kim, Seong Gyu Hwang, Won Choong Choi, Won Young Tak, Heon Ju Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Byung Cheol Yun, Sung Wook Lee, Soon Koo Baik, Seung Ha Park, Ji Won Park, Sol Ji Park, Ji Sung Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2018-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2018;volume=131;issue=14;spage=1645;epage=1651;aulast=Jun
id doaj-4375db57a3ec44e8accc6010238eafd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4375db57a3ec44e8accc6010238eafd92020-11-25T02:28:06ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992018-01-01131141645165110.4103/0366-6999.235880Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)Dae Won JunSang Bong AhnTae Yeob KimJoo Hyun SohnSang Gyune KimSe Whan LeeByung Ho KimDong Joon KimJa Kyung KimHyoung Su KimSeong Gyu HwangWon Choong ChoiWon Young TakHeon Ju LeeKi Tae YoonByung Cheol YunSung Wook LeeSoon Koo BaikSeung Ha ParkJi Won ParkSol Ji ParkJi Sung LeeBackground: Until now, various types of combined therapy with nucleotide analogs and pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) in patients with hepatitis B patients have been tried. However, studies regarding the benefits of de novo combination, late-add on, and sequential treatment are very limited. The objective of the current study was to identify the efficacy of sequential treatment of Peg-INF after short-term antiviral treatment. Methods: Between June 2010 and June 2015, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients (n = 162) received Peg-IFN for 48 weeks (mono-treatment group, n = 81) and entecavir (ETV) for 12 weeks with a 48-week course of Peg-IFN starting at week 5 of ETV therapy (sequential treatment group, n = 81). The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at the end of follow-up period after the 24-week treatment. The primary endpoint was analyzed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and regression analysis. Results: HBeAg seroconversion rate (18.2% vs. 18.2%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) and seroclearance rate (19.7% vs. 19.7%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) were same in both mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups. The rate of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (45.5% vs. 54.5%, t = 1.12, P = 0.296) and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA <2000 U/L (28.8% vs. 28.8%, t = 0.10, P = 1.000) was not different in sequential and mono-treatment groups at 24 weeks of Peg-INF. Viral response rate (HBeAg seroconversion and serum HBV-DNA <2000 U/L) was not different in the two groups (12.1% vs. 16.7%, t = 1.83, P = 0.457). Baseline HBV-DNA level (7 log10U/ml vs. 7.5 log10U/ml, t = 1.70, P = 0.019) and hepatitis B surface antigen titer (3.6 log10U/ml vs. 4.0 log10U/ml, t = 2.19, P = 0.020) were lower and predictors of responder in mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups, respectively. Conclusions: The current study shows no differences in HBeAg seroconversion rate, ALT normalization, and HBV-DNA levels between mono-therapy and sequential therapy regimens. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01220596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01220596?term=NCT01220596&rank=1.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2018;volume=131;issue=14;spage=1645;epage=1651;aulast=JunEntecavir; Hepatitis B; Peginterferon Alfa-2a
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dae Won Jun
Sang Bong Ahn
Tae Yeob Kim
Joo Hyun Sohn
Sang Gyune Kim
Se Whan Lee
Byung Ho Kim
Dong Joon Kim
Ja Kyung Kim
Hyoung Su Kim
Seong Gyu Hwang
Won Choong Choi
Won Young Tak
Heon Ju Lee
Ki Tae Yoon
Byung Cheol Yun
Sung Wook Lee
Soon Koo Baik
Seung Ha Park
Ji Won Park
Sol Ji Park
Ji Sung Lee
spellingShingle Dae Won Jun
Sang Bong Ahn
Tae Yeob Kim
Joo Hyun Sohn
Sang Gyune Kim
Se Whan Lee
Byung Ho Kim
Dong Joon Kim
Ja Kyung Kim
Hyoung Su Kim
Seong Gyu Hwang
Won Choong Choi
Won Young Tak
Heon Ju Lee
Ki Tae Yoon
Byung Cheol Yun
Sung Wook Lee
Soon Koo Baik
Seung Ha Park
Ji Won Park
Sol Ji Park
Ji Sung Lee
Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
Chinese Medical Journal
Entecavir; Hepatitis B; Peginterferon Alfa-2a
author_facet Dae Won Jun
Sang Bong Ahn
Tae Yeob Kim
Joo Hyun Sohn
Sang Gyune Kim
Se Whan Lee
Byung Ho Kim
Dong Joon Kim
Ja Kyung Kim
Hyoung Su Kim
Seong Gyu Hwang
Won Choong Choi
Won Young Tak
Heon Ju Lee
Ki Tae Yoon
Byung Cheol Yun
Sung Wook Lee
Soon Koo Baik
Seung Ha Park
Ji Won Park
Sol Ji Park
Ji Sung Lee
author_sort Dae Won Jun
title Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
title_short Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
title_full Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
title_fullStr Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study)
title_sort efficacy of pegylated interferon monotherapy versus sequential therapy of entecavir and pegylated interferon in hepatitis b e antigen-positive hepatitis b patients: a randomized, multicenter, phase iiib open-label study (potent study)
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Chinese Medical Journal
issn 0366-6999
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: Until now, various types of combined therapy with nucleotide analogs and pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) in patients with hepatitis B patients have been tried. However, studies regarding the benefits of de novo combination, late-add on, and sequential treatment are very limited. The objective of the current study was to identify the efficacy of sequential treatment of Peg-INF after short-term antiviral treatment. Methods: Between June 2010 and June 2015, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients (n = 162) received Peg-IFN for 48 weeks (mono-treatment group, n = 81) and entecavir (ETV) for 12 weeks with a 48-week course of Peg-IFN starting at week 5 of ETV therapy (sequential treatment group, n = 81). The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at the end of follow-up period after the 24-week treatment. The primary endpoint was analyzed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and regression analysis. Results: HBeAg seroconversion rate (18.2% vs. 18.2%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) and seroclearance rate (19.7% vs. 19.7%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) were same in both mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups. The rate of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (45.5% vs. 54.5%, t = 1.12, P = 0.296) and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA <2000 U/L (28.8% vs. 28.8%, t = 0.10, P = 1.000) was not different in sequential and mono-treatment groups at 24 weeks of Peg-INF. Viral response rate (HBeAg seroconversion and serum HBV-DNA <2000 U/L) was not different in the two groups (12.1% vs. 16.7%, t = 1.83, P = 0.457). Baseline HBV-DNA level (7 log10U/ml vs. 7.5 log10U/ml, t = 1.70, P = 0.019) and hepatitis B surface antigen titer (3.6 log10U/ml vs. 4.0 log10U/ml, t = 2.19, P = 0.020) were lower and predictors of responder in mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups, respectively. Conclusions: The current study shows no differences in HBeAg seroconversion rate, ALT normalization, and HBV-DNA levels between mono-therapy and sequential therapy regimens. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01220596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01220596?term=NCT01220596&rank=1.
topic Entecavir; Hepatitis B; Peginterferon Alfa-2a
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2018;volume=131;issue=14;spage=1645;epage=1651;aulast=Jun
work_keys_str_mv AT daewonjun efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT sangbongahn efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT taeyeobkim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT joohyunsohn efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT sanggyunekim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT sewhanlee efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT byunghokim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT dongjoonkim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT jakyungkim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT hyoungsukim efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT seonggyuhwang efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT wonchoongchoi efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT wonyoungtak efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT heonjulee efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT kitaeyoon efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT byungcheolyun efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT sungwooklee efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT soonkoobaik efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT seunghapark efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT jiwonpark efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT soljipark efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
AT jisunglee efficacyofpegylatedinterferonmonotherapyversussequentialtherapyofentecavirandpegylatedinterferoninhepatitisbeantigenpositivehepatitisbpatientsarandomizedmulticenterphaseiiibopenlabelstudypotentstudy
_version_ 1724840377643433984